脊柱骨质疏松性压缩性骨折经皮穿刺椎体成形后骨水泥渗漏风险分析及列线图预测模型的构建

韩毅; 蔡力; 冯枭

doi:10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2023.06.013

PDF(2651 KB)

解剖学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6) : 710-715. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2023.06.013

解剖学

脊柱骨质疏松性压缩性骨折经皮穿刺椎体成形后骨水泥渗漏风险分析及列线图预测模型的构建

韩毅* 蔡力冯枭

作者信息 +

Risk analysis of bone cement leakage after percutaneous puncture vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal compression fractures and construction of a predictive model with column line drawings

HAN Yi* CAI Li FENG Xiao

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨骨质疏松性脊柱压缩性骨折患者经皮穿刺椎体成形术治疗后骨水泥渗漏风险及列线图预测模型的构建。方法选取2019年12月~2021年12月广元市第二人民医院就诊的236例骨质疏松性脊柱压缩性骨折患者为研究对象，根据经皮穿刺椎体成形术治疗后是否发生骨水泥渗漏分为渗漏组（n=58）和未渗漏组（n=178）。收集患者临床资料，分析骨水泥渗漏的相关因素；绘制受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线，分析各相关因素对骨水泥渗漏的预测价值；采用Logistic多元回归模型分析影响骨水泥渗漏的危险因素；采用R语言软件4.0“rms”包构建列线图预测模型。结果渗漏组与未渗漏组患者在年龄、骨密度、椎体压缩程度、椎体终板/后壁完整、骨水泥黏度和骨水泥注射量方面的差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。年龄、骨密度、骨水泥注射量预测骨水泥渗漏的曲线下面积（AUC）分别为0.804、0.825、0.803；最佳截断值分别为71岁、0.67g/cm2、4.4ml。年龄（>71岁）、骨密度（≤0.67g/cm2）、椎体压缩程度（重度）、椎体终板/后壁完整（否）、骨水泥黏度（低黏度）、骨水泥注射量（>4.4ml）是骨水泥渗漏的独立危险因素。列线图模型预测骨水泥渗漏C-index为0.802（95%CI：0.689~0.868），阈值>0.19，列线图模型提供临床净收益。结论年龄、骨密度、椎体压缩程度、椎体终板/后壁完整、骨水泥黏度、骨水泥注射量是骨水泥渗漏的独立危险因素，以此为预测因子构建的列线图预测模型具有临床应用价值。

Abstract

Objective To analysis risk factor and to construct a line graph prediction model for bone cement leakage after percutaneous transluminal vertebroplasty treatment in patients with osteoporotic spinal compression fractures. Methods A total of 236 patients with osteoporotic spinal compression fractures who came to our hospital from December 2019 to December 2021 were selected for the study, and they were divided into a leakage group (n=58) and a non-leakage group (n=178) according to whether bone cement leakage occurred after percutaneous transluminal vertebroplasty treatment. The clinical data were collected to analyze the factors associated with bone cement leakage; The work receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves of the subjects were drawn to analyze the predictive value of each relevant factor on bone cement leakage; The Logistic multiple regression model was used to analyze the risk factors affecting bone cement leakage; The R language software 4.0 “rms” package was used to construct the prediction model of column line diagram. Results The differences in age, bone density, degree of vertebral compression, vertebral endplate/posterior wall integrity, bone cement viscosity, and bone cement injection volume between patients in the leaky and non-leaky groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The area under curve(AUCs) for age, bone density, and cement injection volume to predict cement leakage were 0.804, 0.825, and 0.803, respectively; The best cutoff values were 71 years, 0.67 g/cm2, and 4.4 ml, respectively. Age (>71 years), bone density (≤0.67 g/cm2), vertebral compression (severe), vertebral endplate/posterior wall integrity (no), cement viscosity (low viscosity), and bone cement injection volume (>4.4 ml) were independent risk factors for bone cement leakage. The column line graph model predicted a C-index of 0.802 (95% CI , 0.689-0.868) for cement leakage, with a threshold >0.19, and the column line graph model provided a net clinical benefit. Conclusion Age, bone density, degree of vertebral compression, vertebral endplate/posterior wall integrity, cement viscosity, and cement injection volume are independent risk factors for cement leakage, and the column line graph prediction model constructed with these predictors is of clinical application.

导出引用

韩毅蔡力冯枭.

脊柱骨质疏松性压缩性骨折经皮穿刺椎体成形后骨水泥渗漏风险分析及列线图预测模型的构建

[J]. 解剖学报. 2023, 54(6): 710-715 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2023.06.013

HAN Yi CAI Li FENG Xiao.

Risk analysis of bone cement leakage after percutaneous puncture vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal compression fractures and construction of a predictive model with column line drawings

[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2023, 54(6): 710-715 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2023.06.013

中图分类号： R683.2

参考文献

［1］Chen J, Chen Y, Zhang ZhSh, et al. Retrospective analysis of the causes of bone cement leakage in percutaneous vertebral retrobulbar kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures［J］. Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Diseases,2017,10(1):27-33. (in Chinese)

陈吉,陈勇,张征石,等.骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折经皮椎体后凸成形术中骨水泥渗漏原因回顾性分析［J］.中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志,2017,10(1):27-33.

［2］Wang WL. Study on the effect of clinical care pathways in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the elderly［J］. China Drugs and Clinics,2019,19(24):4424-4426. (in Chinese)

王文兰.临床护理路径在老年骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折治疗中的效果研究［J］.中国药物与临床,2019,19(24):4424-4426.

［3］Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures［J］.Osteoporos Int,2006,17(12):1726-1733.

［4］Lavelle W, Carl A, Lavelle ED, et al. Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty［J］.Med Clin North Am,2007, 25(2):913-928.

［5］Yang EZ, Xu JG, Huang GZ, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in aged patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study［J］. Spine, 2016,41(8):653.

［6］Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos Ⅱ): an open-label randomised trial［J］. Lancet,2010,376(9746):1085-1092.

［7］Yuan Z, Zhou Y, Zhou X, et al. Severe pulmonary embolism was secondary to cement inferior vena cava embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty［J］.Ann Vasc Surg,2018,48:255.e1-255.e3.

［8］Zhao ZB. Analysis of risk factors for intraoperative bone cement leakage in elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty［J］. China Drugs and Clinics,2020,20(23):3963-3965. (in Chinese)

赵泽斌.老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者经皮椎体成形术术中骨水泥渗漏的危险因素分析［J］.中国药物与临床,2020,20(23):3963-3965.

［9］Cha DSh, Xu WY, Huang JW, et al. Retrospective analysis of bone cement leakage from percutaneous vertebroplasty［J］. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy,2019,37(3):316-321,327. (in Chinese)

查丁胜,徐武岩,黄嘉文,等.经皮椎体成形术骨水泥渗漏的回顾性分析［J］.中国临床解剖学杂志,2019,37(3):316-321,327.

［10］Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, et al. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye［J］.Lancet Oncol,2015,16(4):e173-180.

［11］Xu ShT, Ge BF, Xu YK. Practical Orthopaedics ［M］. 4th ed. Beijing:People’s Military Medical Publishing House, 2012: 91-92. (in Chinese)

胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学［M］.第4版.北京:人民军医出版社,2012:91-92.

［12］Li WL, Wang HSh, Ning LJ, et al. Analysis of the risk of bone cement leakage after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis and validation of the prediction model［J］. Chinese Tissue Engineering Research, 2022, 26(10): 1477-1482. (in Chinese)

李文乐,王浩胜,宁丽俊,等.骨质疏松患者经皮椎体成形后骨水泥渗漏风险分析及预测模型验证［J］.中国组织工程研究,2022,26(10):1477-1482

［13］Wang PQ, Zhang ShM. Risk factors for recurrent vertebral fractures after percutaneous translaminar vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures［J］. International Journal of Nursing,2021,40(20):3686-3689. (in Chinese)

王培芹,张绍梅.骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折经皮穿刺椎体成形术后再发椎体骨折的危险因素［J］.国际护理学杂志, 2021, 40(20): 3686-3689.

［14］Filippiadis DK, Marcia S, Masala S, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: current status, new developments and old controversies［J］.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2017,40(12):1815-1823.

［15］Jiang RL, Yin AK, Zhao XY, et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with postoperative re-fracture of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures［J］. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics,2022,25(2):171-174. (in Chinese)

蒋荣莉,殷安康,赵翔宇,等.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折术后再发骨折的相关危险因素分析［J］.临床骨科杂志,2022,25(2):171-174.

［16］Wang YX, Xu HD, Zhao JN. Research progress of vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures［J］. Biological Orthopaedic Materials and Clinical Research,2019,16(6):70-74. (in Chinese)

王宇翔,徐海栋,赵建宁.椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的研究进展［J］.生物骨科材料与临床研究,2019,16(6):70-74.

［17］Zou XN. Recovery of vertebral body height and related influencing factors in high-viscosity cemented vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures［J］. Chinese Journal of Spinal Cord,2017,27(11):991-996. (in Chinese)

邹向南.高黏度骨水泥椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的椎体高度恢复情况及相关影响因素［J］.中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2017,27(11):991-996.

［18］Weisskopf M, Miltner O, Maus U, et al. Intravertebral pressure gradient during vertebroplasty［J］.Skeletal Radiol, 2013, 42(1):79-84.

［19］Zhong BY, He SC, Zhu HD, et al. Nomogram for predicting intradiscal cement leakage following percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic related vertebral compression fractures［J］.Pain Physician,2017,20(4):E513-E520.

［20］Xie T. Nomogram study of bone cement leakage after percutaneous vertebroplasty［J］. Journal of Beihua University (Natural Science Edition),2020,21(3):381-384. (in Chinese)

谢涛.经皮椎体成形术后骨水泥渗漏的Nomogram研究［J］.北华大学学报(自然科学版),2020,21(3):381-384.

［21］Shi Y, Zhang YQ, Liu Y, et al. High viscosity cemented vertebral body kyphoplasty for stage Ⅲ Kümmell’s disease without neurological symptoms: restoration of vertebral body height, reduction of kyphotic deformity and restoration of sagittal spine sequence［J］. Chinese Tissue Engineering Research,2022,26(10):1490-1494. (in Chinese)

石焱,张云庆,刘勇,等.高黏度骨水泥椎体后凸成形治疗无神经症状Ⅲ期Kümmell病:恢复椎体高度、减小后凸畸形与恢复脊柱矢状序列［J］.中国组织工程研究,2022,26(10):1490-1494.

［22］Zhan Y, Jiang J, Liao H,et al. Risk factors for cement leakage after vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty: a metaanalysis of published evidence［J］.World Neurosurg, 2017,101:633-642.