Comparison of protein preparation methods for Gel-based proteomics

BU Wang-yu QI Yi-jun* WEI Hua ZHANG Juan MA Jin WANG Ming MA Yuan-fang

Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2013, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6) : 865-868.

Welcome to visit Acta Anatomica Sinica! Today is Chinese
Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2013, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6) : 865-868. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1356.2013.06.023

Comparison of protein preparation methods for Gel-based proteomics

  • BU Wang-yu1 QI Yi-jun 1* WEI Hua2 ZHANG Juan1 MA Jin1 WANG Ming1 MA Yuan-fang1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficiency of protein preparation for human esophageal tissue protein diluted in PBS by ultracentrifugation and 7 protocols for protein precipitation. Methods Eight protocols, which included ultracentrifugation and 7 protocols for protein precipitation [ammonium sulfate, chloroform/methanol, acidified acetone/methanol, ethanol, acetone, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), TCA/acetone], were used to extract PBS-diluted mixed protein samples derived from human esophageal cancer tissue (10 cases). Protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic acid(BCA), Bradford and 2D quantification kits. The recovered protein diluted in 2D rehydration buffer was separated either by one-dimensinal mini-gel electrophoresis or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D) followed by ImageMaster software analysis. Results Protein quantification protocols by Bradford and 2D were compatible with 2D rehydration buffer. With the exception of the protein recovery rates for the ultracentrifugation and ammonium sulphate precipitation which were 40% and 4%, respectively, the protein recovery rates for remained methods were 22%. In view of protein spot boundary, number and resolving ability, aectone-precipitated protein produced the best quality of 2D images, followed by precipitation protocols of ethanol and chloroform/methanol, and ultracentrifugation. Acidified acetone/methanol protocol produced the greatest protein spot lost. Conclusion Acetone precipitation protocol is feasible with protein samples with high concentration and small volume, while ultracentrifugation is for other protein samples.

Key words

Esophagus / Protein preparation / Proteomics / Protein precipitation / Ultracentrifugation / Two-dimensional electrophoresis

Cite this article

Download Citations
BU Wang-yu QI Yi-jun* WEI Hua ZHANG Juan MA Jin WANG Ming MA Yuan-fang. Comparison of protein preparation methods for Gel-based proteomics[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2013, 44(6): 865-868 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0529-1356.2013.06.023

References

[1] Hirano M, Rakwal R, Shibato J, et al. New protein extraction/solubilization protocol for gel-based proteomics of rat (female) whole brain and brain regions[J]. Mol Cells, 2006, 22(1):119-125.
[2]Fic E, Kedracka-Krok S, Jankowska U, et al. Comparison of protein precipitation methods for various rat brain structures prior to proteomic analysis[J]. Electrophoresis, 2010, 31(21):3573-3579.
[3]Jiang L, He L, Fountoulakis M. Comparison of protein precipitation methods for sample preparation prior to proteomic analysis[J]. J Chromatogr A, 2004, 1023(2):317-320.
[4]Thongboonkerd V, Chutipongtanate S, Kanlaya R. Systematic evaluation of sample preparation methods for gel-based human urinary proteomics: quantity, quality, and variability[J]. J Proteome Res, 2006, 5(1):183-191. 

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/