Blended learning practice of neuroanatomy in nursing major at Peking Union Medical College#br#

QIAO Ying-zhi, WANG Wei-qing, GU Huai-yu, ZHU Shao-fang

Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (5) : 572-577.

PDF(897 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Anatomica Sinica! Today is Chinese
PDF(897 KB)
Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (5) : 572-577. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2026.06.008
Digital-Intelligent Anatomy Teaching

Blended learning practice of neuroanatomy in nursing major at Peking Union Medical College#br#

  • QIAO  Ying-zhi1, WANG  Wei-qing2, GU  Huai-yu3*, ZHU  Shao-fang4*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To develop a blended learning model integrating three-dimensional visualization with scenario-based strategies and evaluate its effect on neuroanatomy learning outcomes among nursing undergraduate students. Methods Using a historical control design, this study designated 133 students from the class of 2024 at the School of Nursing, Peking Union Medical College as the traditional teaching group (TT), and 133 students from the class of 2025 as the blended learning group (BL). The BL group received four supplementary instructional strategies in addition to traditional teaching: three-dimensional imaging, virtual reality cloud-recorded sessions, anatomic model construction, and peer teaching. Upon course completion, both groups completed a theory examination of equivalent difficulty, with items drawn from a shared question bank administered under unified conditions, and anonymous questionnaires were administered to each group (TT group: voluntary completion, n=101; BL group: voluntary completion, n=133). Welch’s independent-samples t-test was used to analyze between-group differences. Results Results showed no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The BL group achieved higher theory examination scores than the TT group (24.0±3.09 vs 17.3±3.95, P<0.001). Course satisfaction (99.2%) and questionnaire response rate (100%) in the BL group were both higher than those in the TT group (88.1%; 75.9%). Between-group differences in self-assessed scores across all four core competency dimensions were statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion The blended learning model developed in this study integrates broadly applicable pedagogical innovations, including three-dimensional visualization, virtual reality, simulation training, and peer teaching, with nursing-relevant clinical case scenarios (embedded within the simulation training component, thereby linking generalizable teaching method  innovation with nursing competency development.

Key words

Neuroanatomy
/ Nursing education / Computer-assisted instruction / Simulated teaching / Three-dimensional visualization / Self-directed learning / Nursing undergraduate

Cite this article

Download Citations
QIAO Ying-zhi, WANG Wei-qing, GU Huai-yu, ZHU Shao-fang. Blended learning practice of neuroanatomy in nursing major at Peking Union Medical College#br#[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2026, 57(5): 572-577 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2026.06.008

References

[1]Liu YL, Wang GL, Zhao GH. Modern Nursing Education[M]. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press, 2002: 6, 24.
[2]Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Dumont AS, et al. A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation[J]. Clin Anat, 2021, 34(1): 108-114.
[3]Nuuyoma V, Josef E. The use of drawing as learning activity in a human anatomy course: implications for learning scientific foundation of nursing[J]. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 2021, 23(2): #8780.
[4]Carraccio C, Wolfsthal SD, Englander R, et al. Shifting paradigms: from Flexner to competencies[J]. Acad Med, 2002, 77(5): 361-367.
[5]Bleakley A, Bligh J, Browne J. Medical Education for the Future: Identity, Power and Location[M]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011.
[6]Aikawa G, Kawashima T, Ota Y, et al. Effectiveness of extended reality-based education on nursing and midwifery students’ knowledge of anatomy, physiology and pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2025, 84: 104343.
[7]Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, et al. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach[M]. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015.
[8]Wang WM, trans. Essential Reading for Medical Teachers: A Practical Teaching Guide[M]. 6th ed. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press, 2022: 2-4.
[9]Zhao Q, Liu W, Zhang HM, et al. Exploration of combined teaching mode of cross-sectional imaging anatomy and regional anatomy based on case-based learning[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College, 2024, 15(5): 1217-1223. (in Chinese)
[10]Liu P, Fang X, Ding HR, et al. Practice of mobile virtual reality devices in human anatomy classroom teaching[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2025, 56(5): 607-611. (in Chinese)
[11]Fang F, Shao XY, Xia CB, et al. Research and practice of blended teaching mode in systematic anatomy laboratory courses[J]. The Medical Forum, 2021, 25(25): 3686-3688.(in Chinese)
[12]Chen XM, Li WQ, Guo YJ, et al. Reflections on medical humanities education from the perspective of anatomy teaching[J]. Progress of Anatomical Sciences, 2020, 26(1): 118-120. (in Chinese)
[13]He P, He QY, Luan LJ, et al. Integrated teaching practice of medical imaging and human anatomy courses in Peking University[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2025, 56(6): 738-742. (in Chinese)

Funding


PDF(897 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉