Finite element analysis of cervical intervertebral discs after removing different ranges of uncinate processes

YANG Yang SHI Jun LI Kun MA Yuan ZHANG Shao-jie HOU Er-fei WANG Chao-qun CHEN Jie WANG Xing LI Zhi-jun

Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1) : 88-97.

PDF(17012 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Anatomica Sinica! Today is Chinese
PDF(17012 KB)
Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1) : 88-97. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2024.01.013
Anatomy

 Finite element analysis of cervical intervertebral discs after removing different ranges of uncinate processes

  •  YANG  Yang SHI Jun2  LI Kun3,4  MA Yuan4  ZHANG Shao-jie3,4  HOU Er-fei3  WANG Chao-qun5, CHEN Jie3  WANG Xing3,4*  LI  Zhi-jun3,4*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective  To study the stress change characteristics of the cervical disc after removing different ranges of the uncinate process by establishing a three-dimensional finite element model of the C0-T1 whole cervical spine to provide a theoretical basis for clinical and surgical treatment.    Methods  After a CT scan of one case of the whole cervical spine, we established a three-dimensional model of the normal cervical spine and designed the model to excise 50% and 100% of the uncinate process on the left side and 100% of the uncinate process on both sides at the same time. The four models’ stress changes (stress and displacement) were compared after loading the same torque under six working conditions, forward flexion, back extension, left and right lateral flexion, and left and right rotation.    Results  With the removal of different ranges of the uncinate process, the stress and displacement values of the disc were concentrated at C5/6 and then gradually decreased. Interlateral differences in disc stress values were found only at C5 after removing 50% of the left C5 uncinate process, and interlateral differences were found at all disc stress values after removing 100% of the C5 uncinate process on the left or both sides.    Conclusion  Removal of different ranges of the uncinate process (50% and 100%) can affect cervical spine stability, and the larger the range of resection is the more it affects cervical spine stability. The best clinical principle is to choose the best possible surgical resection in this area that can achieve the least resection and the best therapeutic effect.

Key words

  Uncinate process / Intervertebral disc / Uncovertebral joint / Cervical spine / Finite element / Mechanical change / Anatomy / Three-dimensional reconstruction / Human

Cite this article

Download Citations
YANG Yang SHI Jun LI Kun MA Yuan ZHANG Shao-jie HOU Er-fei WANG Chao-qun CHEN Jie WANG Xing LI Zhi-jun.  Finite element analysis of cervical intervertebral discs after removing different ranges of uncinate processes[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2024, 55(1): 88-97 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2024.01.013

References

   [1]  Wu ZD. Surgery [M]. 9th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2018: 726-729. (in Chinese)
吴在德.外科学[M].第9版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018:726-729.
  [2] Wang X, Shi J, Zhang ShJ, et al. Correlation research and clinical significance between youth cervical hook and transverse foramen[J]. Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery, 2016, 25(10): 728-731. (in Chinese)
王星,史君,张少杰,等.青少年颈椎钩突与横突孔的相关性研究及临床意义[J].局解手术学杂志,2016,25(10):728-731.
   [3] Resnick D. Degenerative diseases of the vertebral column[J]. Radiology. 1985, 156(1): 3-14.
   [4] Roelofs AJ, Kania K, Rafipay AJ, et al. Identification of the skeletal progenitor cells forming osteophytes in osteoarthritis[J].Ann Rheum Dis, 2020, 79(12): 1625-1634.
 [5]Kocabiyik N, Ercikti N, Tunali S. Morphometric analysis of the uncinate processes of the cervical vertebrae[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz), 2017, 76(3): 440-445.
 [6]Wang Q, Li HX, Zhang YT, et al. The application value of multislice CT in showing foraminal stenosis in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J]. Hebei Medical Journal,2018, 40(22): 3439-3442. (in Chinese)
王祺, 李会侠, 张永婷, 等. 多层螺旋CT显示神经根型颈椎病椎间孔狭窄的应用价值[J].河北医药, 2018, 40(22):3439-3442.
 [7]Lin D, Chen ChQ, Lin D, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without uncovertebral joint decompression[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China, 2018, 26(1): 11-16. (in Chinese)
林栋, 陈长青, 林东, 等. 保留与切除钩椎关节在颈前路手术的临床效果比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(1):11-16.
 [8]Guo W, Ding Zh, Huang JW, et al. Application of ACDF combined with partial resection of uncinate joint in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radicular disease[J]. Orthopaedics, 2019, 10(6): 492-498. (in Chinese)
郭伟,丁州, 皇静文,等.颈椎前路减压融合术联合钩椎关节部分切除在神经根型颈椎病治疗中的应用[J].骨科,2019,10(6):492-498.
 [9]Kabel J, van Rietbergen B, Dalstra M, et al. The role of an effective isotropic tissue modulus in the elastic properties of cancellous bone[J]. J Biomech, 1999, 32(7): 673-680.
 [10]Panjabi MM, Crisco JJ, Vasavada A, et al. Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26(24):2692-2700.
 [11]Ito S, Ivancic PC, Panjabi MM, et al. Soft tissue injury threshold during simulated whiplash: a biomechanical investigation[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29(9):979-987.
 [12]Liu WC, Chen XSh, Zhou ShY, et al. Establishment and significance of a three-dimension finite element model of the whole cervical spine(C0-T1) in normal human[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018,22(11):1707-1712. (in Chinese)
刘伟聪, 陈雄生, 周盛源, 等.正常人体C0-T1全颈椎有限元模型的构建及意义[J].中国组织工程研究,2018,22(11):1707-1712.
 [13]Liu QH, Cai YQ, Jin F, et al. Finite element model of the 12-year-old child whole cervical spine:establishment and validity verification based on CT data[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2023,27(4): 500-504. (in Chinese)
刘清华,蔡永强,金凤,等. CT数据建立12岁儿童全颈椎有限元模型及有效性验证[J].中国组织工程研究,2023,27(4):500-504.
 [14]Lannon M, Kachur E. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: clinical presentation, assessment, and natural history[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(16): 3626.
 [15]Mella P, Suk KS, Kim HS, et al. ACDF with total En bloc resection of uncinate in foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: comparison with conventional ACDF[J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2021, 34(4): E237-E242.
 [16]Huang T, Qin J, Zhong W, et al. The CT assessment of uncovertebral joints degeneration in a healthy population[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2021, 26(1): 145.
 [17]Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Haman SP, et al. Anatomic basis of the anterior surgery on the cervical spine: relationships between uncus-artery-root complex and vertebral artery injury[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 1998, 20(6): 389-392.
 [18]Tubbs RS, Vahedi P, Loukas M, et al. Hubert von Luschka (1820-1875): his life, discoveries, and contributions to our understanding of the nervous system[J]. J Neurosurg, 2011, 114(1): 268-272.
 [19]Taylor J, Twomey L, Bo L. Contrasts between cervical and Lumbar motion segments[J]. Critical Reviews in Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine, 2000, 12(4): 28.
 [20]Tong L,  Xu YY,  Wang YD, et al. Finite element analysis of anterior cervical micro-memory compression alloy plate [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(3): 320-326. (in Chinese)
仝铃,许阳阳,王一丹,等.颈椎前路微型记忆加压合金板的有限元分析[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2022, 40(3): 320-326.
 [21]Stoner KE, Abode-Iyamah KO, Fredericks DC, et al. A comprehensive finite element model of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2020, 74: 79-86.
 [22]Cui S, Nasser AE, Ma L, et al. Analysis of the morphometric change in the uncinate process of the cervical spondylosis patients: a study of radiological anatomy[J]. J Orthop Translat, 2020, 24: 32-38.
 [23]Raveendranath V, Kavitha T, Umamageswari A. Morphometry of the uncinate process, vertebral body, and lamina of the C3-7 vertebrae relevant to cervical spine surgery[J]. Neurospine, 2019, 16(4): 748-755.
 [24]Bo XF, Chen Z, Wang H, et al. Finite element analysis on the effects of uncinate process resection on the stability of cervical spine[J]. Beijing Biomedical Engineering, 2015, 34(5): 447-453. (in Chinese)
薄雪峰, 陈赞, 王辉, 等.部分钩突切除对颈椎稳定性影响的有限元分析[J].北京生物医学工程, 2015, 34(5):447-453.
 [25]Bo XF, Xi M, Hui W, et al. Biomechanical stability of the cervical spine after uncinate process resection: a finite element analysis[J]. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 2015, 15(6): 1540049. 
 [26]Chen TY, Crawford NR, Sonntag VK, er al. Biomechanical effects of progressive anterior cervical decompression[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26(1): 6-13.
 [27]Snyder JT, Tzermiadianos MN, Ghanayem AJ, et al. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(26): 2965-2969.
 [28]Yoganandan N, Purushothaman Y, Choi H, et al. Biomechanical effects of uncinate process excision in cervical disc arthroplasty[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2021, 89: 105451.
 [29]Lee BH, Park JH, Lee JY, et al. Efficiency of minimal oblique resection of the uncinate process during an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(31): e26790.
PDF(17012 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/