Sex differences in the morphology of the distal humerus in Ming and Qing Dynasties population in North China

CHENG Zhi-han RAN Zhi-yu LING Liang-you HE Jia-ning

Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (3) : 328-334.

PDF(2454 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Anatomica Sinica! Today is Chinese
PDF(2454 KB)
Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (3) : 328-334. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2023.03.011
Anatomy

Sex differences in the morphology of the distal humerus in Ming and Qing Dynasties population in North China

  • CHENG  Zhi-han  RAN  Zhi-yu  LING  Liang-you  HE  Jia-ning*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To explore the feasibility and accuracy of sex determination by morphology of the distal humerus in North China population.   Methods Observing sexually dimorphic differences of olecranon fossa shape, trochlear symmetry, trochlear constriction and angle of medial epicondyle. Each characteristic was divided into three categories: male, unknown and female. The morphological characteristics of the humerus of 70 individuals (35 males and 35 females) from the Ming and Qing Dynasties in North China were counted to compare the occurrence rate of different categories of distal humeral morphology and the accuracy rate of sex determination.   Results There were statistically significant differences in the performance of the four traits of the distal humerus between males and females. The accuracy rate of angle of medial epicondyle was the highest at 76%, while the lowest accuracy rate of trochlear constriction was only 52%. The accuracy of the combined four traits was higher than the single ones, with an accuracy rate of 76% (83% for males and 68% for females).   Conclusion Distal humerus morphology can be used to determine sex when skulls and pelvis are absent.

Key words

Sex determination / Distal humerus morphology / Nonmetric traits / Anatomy / Ming and Qing Dynasties population in North China

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHENG Zhi-han RAN Zhi-yu LING Liang-you HE Jia-ning. Sex differences in the morphology of the distal humerus in Ming and Qing Dynasties population in North China[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2023, 54(3): 328-334 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2023.03.011

References

[1]Phenice TW. A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis [J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 1969, 30(2): 297-301.
[2]Giles E, Elliot O. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania [J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 1963, 21(1): 53-68.
[3]Fairgrieve S. Forensic Osteological Analysis: A Book of Case Studies [M]. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher Ltd, 1999: 36-59.
[4]Mays S, Cox M. Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science [M]. London: Greenwich Medical Media, 2000: 117-130.
[5]Steyn M,  I?can MY. Osteometric variation in the humerus sexual dimorphism in South Africans [J]. Forensic Sci Int, 1999, 106(2): 77-85.
[6]Liu W. Sex discrimination analysis of long bones of upper limb[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinic, 1989, 8(3):231-239. (in Chinese)
刘武. 上肢长骨的性别判别分析 [J]. 人类学学报, 1989, 8(3): 231-239.
[7]I?can MY, Loth SR, A.King C, et al. Sexual dimorphism in the humerus: a comparative analysis of Chinese, Japanese and Thais [J]. Forensic Sci Int, 1998, 98(1-2): 17-29.
[8]Rogers TL. A visual method of determining the sex of skeletal remains using the distal humerus [J]. J Forensic Sci, 1999, 44(1): 57-60.
[9]Wanek V. A Qualitative analysis for sex determination in humans utilizing posterior and medial aspects of the distal humerus [D]. Portland: Portland State University, 2002.
[10]Rogers TL. Sex determination of adolescent skeletons using the distal humerus [J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2009, 140(1): 143-148.
[11]Vance VL, Steyn M, L’Abbe E N. Nonmetric sex determination from the distal and posterior humerus in black and white South Africans [J]. J Forensic Sci, 2011, 56(3): 710-714.
[12]Watkinson L. ‘Funny bones’: an evaluation of the Rogers visual method of sex estimation, using the posterior distal humerus [D]. Durham: University of Durham, 2012.
[13]Tallman SD. The evaluation and refinement of nonmetric sex and ancestry assesment methods in modern Japanese and Thai individuals [D]. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, 2016.
[14]Bruzek J. A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone [J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2002, 117(2): 157-168.
[15]Ding ZH, Liu ShW. Gray’s Anatomy[M]. 41st ed. Ji’nan: Shandong Science and Technology Press,2017: 838-861. (in Chinese)
丁自海, 刘树伟,主译.格氏解剖学[M].第41版.济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 2017: 838-861.
[16]Pearson K. On the problem of sexing osteometric material [J]. Biometrika, 1915, 10(4): 479-487.
[17]Spradley MK, Jantz RL. Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements [J]. J Forensic Sci, 2011, 56(2):289-296.
[18]Liu Y, Shi YT, Yan Q.Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing:People’s Military Medical Press, 2014:181. (in Chinese)
刘颖,师玉涛,闫琪,主译. 骨骼肌肉功能解剖学[M].第2版. 北京:人民军医出版社, 2014:181.
PDF(2454 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/