Design and validation of a surgical guide for the retrieval of foreign body instruments in jaw

MAO Meng-yun WANG Cheng-ze ZHU Hai-hua FAN Ming-xing WU Xiao-fei ZHU Fu-dong

Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2) : 244-248.

PDF(9669 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Anatomica Sinica! Today is Chinese
PDF(9669 KB)
Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2) : 244-248. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2023.02.018
Technology and Methodology

Design and validation of a surgical guide for the retrieval of foreign body instruments in jaw

  • MAO  Meng-yun1  WANG Cheng-ze 1  ZHU  Hai-hua1  FAN  Ming-xing2  WU  Xiao-fei3  ZHU  Fu-dong1* 
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective  To design and validate a novel surgical guide for retrieval of foreign body in jaw.     Methods Firstly, a surgical guide based on cone beam computed tomography and trephine technique was designed to remove broken dental instrument fragments. Its feasibility and accuracy were assessed by removing broken dental instrument in goat mandible, and then it was successfully applied in clinical cases. The linear and angular discrepancies between actual and planned columnar bone with imaginary fragment was analyzed. The euclidean distance was measured at the hex and apex of the columnar bone and the angle of axis deviation was also calculated. We obtained seven parameters (cdh, cda, hdh, hda, vdh, vda, and ad) to describe deviations.    Results  Mean central deviation at the hex and apex was (0.51 ± 0.14) mm and (0.62 ± 0.19) mm, respectively. Accompanying mean values were as follow: horizontal deviation at the hex was (0.48 ± 0.16) mm, horizontal deviation at the apex was (0.52 ± 0.22) mm, vertical deviation at the hex was (0.17 ± 0.09) mm, vertical deviation at the apex was (0.29 ± 0.13) mm, and angular deviation of (5.38 ± 3.43) degrees. In a clinical case, the guide successfully located and removed the fracture file.    Conclusion  This study reveals that this kind novel surgical guide could aid to locate and remove the foreign body in jaw. 

Key words

Surgical guide / Foreign body in mandible / Cone-beam computed tomography / Goat

Cite this article

Download Citations
MAO Meng-yun WANG Cheng-ze ZHU Hai-hua FAN Ming-xing WU Xiao-fei ZHU Fu-dong. Design and validation of a surgical guide for the retrieval of foreign body instruments in jaw[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2023, 54(2): 244-248 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2023.02.018

References

 [1]Satheesh  SL, Jain S, Bhuyan AC, et al. Surgical management of a separated endodontic instrument using second generation platelet concentrate and hydroxyapatite[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017, 11 (6):ZD01-ZD03.
 [2]Silva  TCG, Maranh?o Filho AWA, Alencar MGM, et al. Vasconcelos, mandibular fracture after third molar removal: a case repor[J] Gen Dent,  2019,67(4):e7-e10.
 [3]Manikandhan  R, Anantanarayanan P, Mathew PC, et al. Incidence and consequences of bur breakage in orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study with discussion of 2 interesting clinical situations[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69 (9):2442-2447.
 [4]Nwashindi  A, Dim EM. Adverse effects of nickel in transosseous wires and surgical implants: literature review[J]. Niger J Med, 2014, 23 (4) 335-343.
 [5]Matsuda  S, Yoshimura H, Yoshida H, et al. Breakage and migration of a high-speed dental hand-piece bur during mandibular third molar extraction: two case reports[J]. Medicine, 2020, 99 (7) e19177.
 [6]Chybicki  D, Lipczyńska-Lewandowska M, Torbicka G, et al.Computer-controlled local anesthesia complication: surgical retrieval of a broken dental needle in noncooperative autistic paediatric patient[J].Case Rep Dent, 2020,2020:6686736.
 [7]D’Haese  J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, et al. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017,73 (1) :121-133.
 [8]Unsal  GS, Turkyilmaz I, Lakhia S. Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: a literature review[J].J Clin Exp Dent, 2020,12 (4) :e409-e417.
 [9]Winnen  RG, Kniha K, Modabber A, et al. Reversal of osseointegration as a novel perspective for the removal of failed dental implants: a review of five patented methods[J].Materials (Basel), 2021,14 (24):7829.
 [10]Xu  LW, You J, Zhang JX, et al. Impact of surgical template on the accuracy of implant placement[J].J Prosthodont, 2016,25 (8): 641-646.
 [11]Sukegawa  S, Yoneda S, Kanno T, et al. Optical surgical navigation-assisted removal of a foreign body using a splint to simplify the registration process: a case report[J]. J Med Case Rep, 2019, 13 (1):209.
 [12]Antal  M, Nagy E, Braunitzer G, et al. Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series[J]. Head Face Med, 2019,15 (1):30.
 [13]Bencharit  S, Staffen A, Yeung M, et al. In vivo tooth-supported implant surgical guides fabricated with desktop stereolithographic printers: fully guided surgery is more accurate than partially guided surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018,76 (7):1431-1439.
 [14]Skjerven  H, Riis UH, Herlofsson BB, et al. In vivo accuracy of implant placement using a full digital planning modality and stereolithographic guides[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019,34 (1):124-132.
 [15]Seo  C, Juodzbalys G. Accuracy of guided surgery via stereolithographic mucosa-supported surgical guide in implant surgery for edentulous patient: a systematic review[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Res, 2018,9 (1):e1.
 [16]Cassetta  M, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, et al. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014,29 (5): 1071-1078.
 [17]Rajaran  JR, Nazimi AJ, Rajandram RK. Iatrogenic displacement of high-speed bur during third molar removal[J].BMJ case reports, 2017,2017: bcr2017221892.
 [18]Tanner  MC, Fischer C, Schmidmaier G, et al. Evidence-based uncertainty: do implant-related properties of titanium reduce the susceptibility to perioperative infections in clinical fracture management? A systematic review[J]. Infection, 2021,49 (5):813-821.
 [19]Ozer  SY, Ozkan G, Cetin E, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographs in decision-making after endodontic instrument fractures[J]. Int J Artif Organs, 2017,40 (9):510-514.
PDF(9669 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/