Anatomy of endoscopic odontoidectomy via submandibular approach

WANG Yu-hui WANG Sheng-lin AN Feng-yang HU Wei-ni LUO Yan-lin ZHU Li MA Fu-rong

Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6) : 769-775.

PDF(8134 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Anatomica Sinica! Today is Chinese
PDF(8134 KB)
Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6) : 769-775. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2022.06.011
Anatomy

Anatomy of endoscopic odontoidectomy via submandibular approach

  • WANG  Yu-hui1  WANG  Sheng-lin2  AN  Feng-yang1  HU Wei-ni1  LUO  Yan-lin ZHU  Li1* MA  Fu-rong1*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To provide the basis for endoscopic craniocervical junction surgery through cervical CT image and endoscopic odontoid process anatomy of atlas, axis and odontoid.   Methods A total of 150 cases of cervical vertebrae were selected for high resolution thin slice plain CT measurement to evaluate the atlantoaxial structure and its adjacent structure, and to estimate the safe boundary of odontoid process resection. The atlantoaxial odontoid process was anatomized on 3 cadaver head specimens under endoscope through the submandibular approach using STORZ endoscopy system and endoscopic surgical instruments.  Results The average length of atlas anterior arch and other anatomical marks were measured by CT, and the safety boundary area of odontoidectomy was estimated to be (240.9 ± 39.92)mm2, male: (248.3 ± 49.64)mm2, Female: (233.2 ± 24.54)mm2. Through the submandibular endoscopic approach, the atlantoaxial anatomy and odontoidectomy anatomy made a transverse incision at the midpoint of the connecting line between one mandibular angle and hyoid bone to expose the submandibular triangle area. Under the endoscope, the digastric muscle and the greater angle of hyoid bone were exposed through the submandibular triangle area, and the retropharyngeal space was passively separated layer by layer to the prevertebral space to expose the prevertebral fascia. After removing the prevertebral tissue, the atlas, the dentate process of the axis, the atlantooccipital joint, the atlantoaxial joint, and part of the foramen magnum were fully exposed.  Conclusion Estimating odontoid resection safety boundary area by CT image, in combination with endoscopic odontoidectomy anatomy via sunbmandibular approach, we can perform the surgery safely and efficiently under the bright of endoscope with surgical instruments, which can significantly reduce the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage and postoperative infection while decompressing.

Key words

Atlas / Odontoidectomy / Endoscopy / Submandibular approach / Cervical spine CT / Human 

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Yu-hui WANG Sheng-lin AN Feng-yang HU Wei-ni LUO Yan-lin ZHU Li MA Fu-rong. Anatomy of endoscopic odontoidectomy via submandibular approach[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2022, 53(6): 769-775 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2022.06.011

References

[1]Kim DH, Cho D, Dickman CA. Surgical Anatomy and Techniques to the Spine[M]. Singapore: Elsevier Singapore PTE LTD, 2013:17-20.
[2]Kwong Y,Rao N, Latief K. Craniometric measurements in the assessment of craniovertebral settling: are they still relevant in the age of cross-sectional imaging[J]? AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011,196(4): W421-425.
[3]Rhoton Jr AL. Rhoton Cranial Anatomy And Surgical Approaches[M]. Philadelphia :Wolters Kluwer Health America, 2003: 606-624.
[4]Salle H, de Albuquerque Cavalcanti Mendes G,Gantois C, et al. Endoscopic submandibular retropharyngeal approach to the craniocervical junction and clivus: an anatomical study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 106: 266-276.
[5]Ricciardi L, Sturiale CL,Izzo A, et al. Submandibular approach for single-stage craniovertebral junction ventral decompression and stabilization: a preliminary cadaveric study of technical feasibility[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 127: 206-212.
[6]Xu Chy, Zhu L,Luo YL. History and proress of paranasal sinuses and nasal-skull based surgical anatomy[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2020, 51(5):732-737.(in Chinese)
徐驰宇, 朱丽,骆岩林. 鼻窦和鼻颅底手术解剖的历史与进展[J]. 解剖学报, 2020, 51(5): 732-737.
[7]Ha WB, Yang DL, Gu ShX, et al, Anatomical study of suboccipital vertebral arteries and surrounding bony structures using virtual reality technology[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2014, 20:802-806.
[8]Boriani S, Presutti L,Gasbarrini A, et al. Atlas of Craniocervical Junction and Cervical Spine Surgery[M]. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017:105-217.
[9]Halderman AA, Barnett SL. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the craniovertebral junction[J]. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022, 8(1):16-24.
[10]Zhu HB, Jia LSh, Sun QQ, et al. Measurment of atlas and its clinical significance[J].Chinese Journal of Anatomy, 1997, (6):517-520.(in Chinese)
朱海波, 贾连顺,孙启全,等.寰椎测量及临床意义[J]. 解剖学杂志, 1997, (6): 517-520.
[11]Cao ZhL, Zhong ShSh, Xu DCh. Anatomical measurement of atlas and axis and its clincal significance[J].Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy,2000, (4):299-301.(in Chinese)
曹正霖,钟世镇,徐达传. 寰枢椎的解剖学测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2000, (4): 299-301.
[12]Eck JC, Vaccaro AR. Surgical Atlas of Spinal Operations[M].New Delhi:Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2013: 1-31.
[13]Schweitzer ME, Hodler J,Cervilla V, et al. Craniovertebral junction: normal anatomy with MR correlation[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1992, 158(5):1087-1090.
[14]McGREGER M. The significance of certain measurements of the skull in the diagnosis of basilar impression[J]. Br J Radiol, 1948, 21(244): 171-181.
[15]Hinck VC, Hopkins CE, Savara BS. Diagnostic criteria of basilar impression[J]. Radiology, 1961, 76: 572-585.
[16]Gonzalez LF, Fiorella D,Crawford NR, et al. Vertical atlantoaxial distraction injuries: radiological criteria and clinical implications[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2004, 1(3): 273-280.
[17]Cronin CG, Lohan DG,Mhuircheartigh JN, et al. CT evaluation of Chamberlain’s, McGregor’s, and McRae’s skull-base lines[J]. Clin Radiol, 2009, 64(1): 64-69.
[18]An FY,Wang YH, Sun JB, et al. Relationship between optic nerve and sinuses based on 3D reconstruction of head and neck CT angiography[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2020, 51(5):644-652.(in Chinese)
安凤杨,王玉辉,孙建斌,等, 头颈部CT血管造影的三维重建视神经与鼻窦的关系[J]. 解剖学报, 2020,51(5): 644-652.
[19]Cronin CG, Lohan DG,Mhuircheartigh JN, et al. MRI evaluation and measurement of the normal odontoid peg position[J]. Clin Radiol, 2007, 62(9): 897-903.
[20]Bahsi I, Orhan M,Kervancioglu P,et al. Anatomical evaluation of nasopalatine canal on cone beam computed tomography images[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz), 2019, 78(1): 153-162.
[21]Lin F, Chi YL,Xu ChY, et al. Anatomical measurement of atlas axis in Chinese and its clinical significance[J].Journal of Wenzhou Medical College, 2004, (4):304-305.(in Chinese)
林锋,池永龙,许崇永,等. 国人寰枢椎影像解剖测量及其临床意义[J]. 温州医学院学报, 2004, (4): 304-305.
[22]Wu Q, Xi XH, Hu KH, et al.Fixed-point coordinate method to measure pedicles of atlas by helical computer tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction[J]. Clinical Medical Engineering, 2009, 16(12):11-13.(in Chinese)
吴强,席新华,胡孔和,等, CT三维定点坐标法对寰枢椎椎弓根的解剖学测量[J]. 临床医学工程, 2009, 16(12): 11-13.
PDF(8134 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/