Classification of glioma and solitary brain metastasis using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics feature

CHEN Jia-yi WANG Bao LIU Ying-chao SHI Yong-hong SONG Zhi-jian

Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6) : 933-939.

PDF(3371 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Anatomica Sinica! Today is Chinese
PDF(3371 KB)
Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6) : 933-939. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2021.06.015
Anatomy

Classification of glioma and solitary brain metastasis using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics feature

  • CHEN Jia-yi1,2 WANG Bao3 LIU Ying-chaoSHI Yong-hong1,2* SONG Zhi-jian1,2*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective  To analyze the difference of radiomics features between solitary brain metastasis and glioma using routine 3T T1, T2 and fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging, to explore the significance of texture features constructed in different directions and angles in tumor regions in distinguishing the two kinds of tumors, and to explore a feasible method  for high-precision classification of solitary brain metastases and gliomas.    Methods  Given the multimodal images of 43 patients with glioma and 45 age- and sex- matched patients with solitary brain metastasis, the gray level co-occurrence matrices of different angles of each slice were constructed from the transverse, coronal and sagittal directions of the tumor regions of these images, and the texture spatial relationship features (including contrast, correlation, energy and homogeneity) were calculated. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to eliminate redundant features and select features with strong distinguishing ability. Finally, SVM linear kernel classifier was used to classify the selected features to achieve the identification of the two kinds of tumors.    Results  When classifying glioma and solitary brain metastasis, the precision, recall, F1 score and accuracy of multimodal and multidirectional combination features were 0.8857, 0.9114, 0.8944 and 0.8922, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve obtained by linear kernel SVM classifier was 0.9602. Totally 40 of the 45 patients with solitary brain metastases were correctly classified, and 39 of the 43 gliomas were correctly classified.   Conclusion  The multimodal and multi-directional combination features of tumor areas can be classified by linear kernel SVM classifier to distinguish gliomas from solitary brain metastases, which can be used as a second opinion to effectively assist doctors in making diagnosis.

Key words

Glioma / Solitary brain metastasis / Radiomics / Gray level co-occurrence matrix / Wilcoxon rank sum test / Principal component analysis / SVM linear kernel classifier / Human

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHEN Jia-yi WANG Bao LIU Ying-chao SHI Yong-hong SONG Zhi-jian. Classification of glioma and solitary brain metastasis using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics feature[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2021, 52(6): 933-939 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2021.06.015

References

[1] Tandel GS, Biswas M, Kakde OG, et al. A review on a deep learning perspective in brain cancer classification [J]. Cancers, 2019, 11(1): 111.
[2] Mitchell D, Kwon H, Kubica P, et al. Brain metastases: an update on multi-disciplinary approach of clinical management [J]. Neurochirurgie, 2021,doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.04.001. 
[3] Srinivasa Reddy A, Chenna Reddy P. MRI brain tumor segmentation and prediction using modified region growing and adaptive SVM [J]. Soft Computing, 2021, 25(5): 4135-4148.
[4] Shree NV, Kumar T. Identification and classification of brain tumor MRI images with feature extraction using DWT and probabilistic neural network [J]. Brain informatics, 2018, 5(1): 23-30.
[5] Arunachalam M, Royappan Savarimuthu S. An efficient and automatic glioblastoma brain tumor detection using shift-invariant shearlet transform and neural networks [J]. Int J Imag Syst Tech, 2017, 27(3): 216-226.
[6] Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, et al. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction [J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2010, 29(6): 1310-1320.
[7] Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL [J]. Neuroimage, 2004, 23(Suppl 1): S208-S219.
[8] Ulaby FT, Kouyate F, Brisco B, et al. Textural infornation in SAR images [J]. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1986, 24(2): 235-245.
[9] Rosner B, Glynn RJ, Ting Lee ML. Incorporation of clustering effects for the Wilcoxon rank sum test: a large-sample approach [J]. Biometrics, 2003, 59(4): 1089-1098.
[10] Breiman L. Bagging predictors [J]. Machine Learning, 1996, 24(2): 123-140.
[11] Varma S, Simon R. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection [J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2006, 7(1): 91.
[12] Hakyemez B, Erdogan C, Gokalp G, et al. Solitary metastases and high-grade gliomas: radiological differentiation by morphometric analysis and perfusion-weighted MRI [J]. Clin Radiol, 2010, 65(1): 15-20.
[13] Swinburne NC, Schefflein J, Sakai Y, et al. Machine learning for semi-automated classification of glioblastoma, brain metastasis and central nervous system lymphoma using magnetic resonance advanced imaging [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2019, 7(11): 232.
[14] Isobe T, Yamamoto T, Akutsu H, et al. Preliminary study for differential diagnosis of intracranial tumors using in vivo quantitative proton MR spectroscopy with correction for T2 relaxation time [J]. Radiography, 2015, 21(1): 42-46.
[15] Jin Y, Peng H, Peng J. Brain glioma localization diagnosis based on magnetic resonance imaging [J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 149: 325-332.
[16] Papageorgiou T, Chourmouzi D, Drevelengas A, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in brain tumors: a study on gliomas and metastases [J]. Physica Medica, 2015, 31(7): 767-773.
[17] Ortiz-Ramón R, Ruiz-Espa?a S, Mollá-Olmos E, et al. Glioblastomas and brain metastases differentiation following an MRI texture analysis-based radiomics approach [J]. Phys Med, 2020, 76: 44-54.
[18] Liang W, Zhao YQ, Gui DQ, et al. Prediction of lung cancer typing based on radiomics[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2019, 50(4): 495-500.(in Chinese)
梁伟,赵艳秋,桂东奇,等.基于影像组学的肺癌分型预测[J].解剖学报, 2019, 50(4): 495-500.
PDF(3371 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/