Soft tissue facial profile of Han nationality young students for different somatotypes in Zibo Shandong

SUN Zhao-xia CHENG Hui WU De-ye

Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1) : 111-118.

PDF(1246 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Anatomica Sinica! Today is Chinese
PDF(1246 KB)
Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1) : 111-118. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2019.01.019
Anthropology

 Soft tissue facial profile of Han nationality young students for different somatotypes in Zibo Shandong

  • SUN Zhao-xia* CHENG Hui WU De-ye
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To observe the differences of somatotype, facial tissue profile between male and female of Han students, and the differences of facial tissue profile in homogeneous somatotype between male and female. Methods A total of 326 males and 478 females who were 18-23 years old with no disability, disease, deformity and no facial plastic history were studied. Somatotype was assessed by Heath-Carter method , and the angles of facial tissue profile were measured by FreeHand MX software. Results Han young males had central somatotype (3.52-3.28-3.40), and females with balanced endomorphy (4.52-3.03-3.23) that facial profile was to accord with esthetic Ricketts and Steiner plane. For total samples, it was negative correlation between height, body weight, tensive biceps girth, calf girth, humerus width and frontonasal angle, it was positive correlation between height and nasal tip angle, tensive biceps girth and nasolabial angle.It was negative correlation between height and mentolabial angle, between body weight, calf girth, endomorphic factor and fontonasal angle. It was positive correlation between ectomorphic factor and fontonasal angle for males homogeneous somatotype (P<0.05). It was negative correlation betweenendomorphic factor and nasolabial angle.It was positive correlation between endomorphic factor and nasal tip angle for females homogeneous somatotype (P<0.05). It was negative correlation between years of age and nasolabial angle for males and females, and mentolabial angle for females(P<0.05). Conclusion Frontonasal angle is different between Han young students. It is different that somatotype influence soft tissue facial profile between Han young students. Frontonasal angle, nasal tip angle, lip convex angle are relative stable with years of age to change for Han young students.

Key words

Han / Soft tissue facial profile / Heath-Carter somatotype method / Young student 

Cite this article

Download Citations
SUN Zhao-xia CHENG Hui WU De-ye.  Soft tissue facial profile of Han nationality young students for different somatotypes in Zibo Shandong[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2019, 50(1): 111-118 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2019.01.019

References

[1] Chako C, Arora K, Mohan S, et al. The soft tissue profile assessment of different Malocclusion groups [J]. J Orofacial Health Sci, 2014,5(1):30-36.
 [2] Farrera A, García-Velasco M, Villanueva M.Quantitative assessment of the facial features of a Mexican population dataset[J].Forensic Sci Int, 2016, 262(283):e1-9. 
 [3] Hujoel PP, Bollen AM, Yuen KC, et al. Phenotypic characteristics of adolescents with concave and convex facial profiles-The national health examination survey[J].Homo, 2016, 67(5):417-432. 
 [4] Mayer C, Windhager S, Schaefer K, et al.BMI and WHR are reflected in female facial shape and texture: a geometric morphometric image analysis[J].PLoS One,2017, 12(1):1-13.
 [5] Shui W, Zhou M, Deng Q, et al. Densely calculated facial soft tissue thickness for craniofacial reconstruction in Chinese adults [J].Forensic Sci Int, 2016, 266(573):e1-12. 
 [6] Carter JEL, Heath BH. Somatotyping: Development and Applications [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990:373-387.
 [7] WHO expert consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies [J]. Lancet, 2004, 363(9403): 157-163. [8] Wen YF,Yang Y, Xi HJ,et al.Somatotype of Han nationality adults in the dialect regions of northern China[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2016,47(2):268-273. (in Chinese)
温有锋;杨洋;席焕久,等.中国北方汉语族群汉族成人的体型[J] 解剖学报,2016,47(2):268-0273. 
 [9] Lundstr?m A, Cooke MS. Proportional analysis of the facial profile in natural head position in Caucasian and Chinese children [J]. Br J Orthodontics, 1991, 18 (1):43-49.
 [10]Foster EJ.Profile preferences among diversified groups [J]. Angle Orthod, 1973, 43(1):34-40.
 [11]Do JH, Jang E, Ku B, et al. Development of an integrated Sasang constitution diagnosis method using face, body shape, voice, and questionnaire information [J].BMC Complement Altern Med, 2012, 12(85):1-9.
 [12]Dias PE, Miranda GE, Beaini TL, et al. Practical application of anatomy of the oral cavity in forensic facial reconstruction [J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(9):1-16.
 [13]Sforza C, Grandi G, Catti F, et al.Age-and sex-related changes in the soft tissues of the orbital region[J].Forensic Sci Int, 2009, 185(1-3):115.e1-8. 
 [14]Tedeschi-Oliveira SV, Beaini TL, Melani RFH. Forensic facial reconstruction: Nasal projection in Brazilian young adults[J].Forensic Sci Int, 2016, 266:123-129.
 [15]Lynch JJ, Cross P, Heaton Ⅴ.Sexual dimorphism of the first rib:a comparative approach using metric and geometric morphometric analyses[J].J Forensic Sci, 2017, 62(5):1251-1258. 
 [16]Susanne C, Bodzsár EB, Castro S. Factor analysis and somatotyping, are these two physique classification methods comparable [J]? Ann Hum Biol, 1998, 25(5):405-414.
 [17]Khosravanifard B, Rakhshan Ⅴ, Raeesi E.Factors influencing attractiveness of soft tissue profile [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2013, 115(1):29-37. 
 [18]Wang JSh,Gao J,Qin ZX, et al.3D measurements and comparison of facial soft tissue of Chinese Han male and female young peopless with normal occlusion [J]. Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2017, 33 (3):368-373. (in Chinese)
王佳帅,高洁,秦再秀,等.汉族正常牙合成年男女面部软组织三维测量与对比研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志,2017,33(3):368-373. 
 [19]Mallett XD, Dryden Ⅰ, Bruegge RV, et al.An exploration of sample representativeness in anthropometric facial comparison[J]. J Forensic Sci, 2010, 55(4):1025-1031. 
PDF(1246 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/