Standardized operational protocol for human brain banking in China

QIU Wen-ying MA Chao BAO Ai-min ZHU Ke-qing HUANG Yue YAN Xiao-xin ZHANG Jing ZHONG Chun-jiu ZHOU Jiang-ning SHEN Yong ZHENG Xiao-ying ZHANG Li-wei SHU You-sheng1 TANG Bei-sha ZHANG Zhen-xin DUAN Shu

Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3) : 334-341.

PDF(298 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Anatomica Sinica! Today is Chinese
PDF(298 KB)
Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3) : 334-341. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2017.03.015
Anatomy

Standardized operational protocol for human brain banking in China

  • QIU Wen-ying1 MA Chao 1* BAO Ai-min2 ZHU Ke-qing2 HUANG Yue3 YAN Xiao-xin4 ZHANG Jing5 ZHONG Chun-jiu6 ZHOU Jiang-ning7 SHEN Yong7 ZHENG Xiao-ying8 ZHANG Li-wei9 SHU You-sheng10 TANG Bei-sha11 ZHANG Zhen-xin12 DUAN Shu-min2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

A human brain bank is an essential facility to support the study of neuroscience and neurological disorders. The roles of the human brain bank in advancing basic and clinical neurosciences have been well established in the developed countries. Human brain bank in China is still under developing and needs to be further promoted. The China Human Brain Bank Consortium has been recently initiated and established by 10 Chinese medical institutes. The Consortium aims to combine the strengths in the neuroscience research fields and to promote collaboration through information sharing and joint research projects across the country. This standardized operational protocol (SOP) is recommended by the academic committee of the Consortium and is adopted from the existing SOPs used by those established human brain banks in other countries and taken into consideration of the status quo in China. We hope that the publication of this SOP will facilitate the construction of more internationalstandard human brain banks via the developing of consistent brain tissue processing standards, and eventually provide strategic guidelines for a nationwide brain tissue resource-sharing system in China.

Key words

Human brain bank / Neuroscience / China

Cite this article

Download Citations
QIU Wen-ying MA Chao BAO Ai-min ZHU Ke-qing HUANG Yue YAN Xiao-xin ZHANG Jing ZHONG Chun-jiu ZHOU Jiang-ning SHEN Yong ZHENG Xiao-ying ZHANG Li-wei SHU You-sheng1 TANG Bei-sha ZHANG Zhen-xin DUAN Shu. Standardized operational protocol for human brain banking in China[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2017, 48(3): 334-341 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2017.03.015

References

[1]Samarasekera N, Al-Shahi Salman R, Huitinga I, et al. Brain banking for neurological disorders[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12(11): 1096-1105.
[2]Yan XX, Ma C, Bao AM, et al. Brain banking as a cornerstone of neuroscience in China[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2015, 14(2): 136.
[3]Tay L, Lim WS, Chan M, et al. New DSM-V neurocognitive disorders criteria and their impact on diagnostic classifications of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in a memory clinic setting[J]. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2015, 23(8): 768-779.
[4]Sachdev PS, Blacker D, Blazer DG, et al. Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2014, 10(11): 634-642.
[5]Farias ST, Mungas D, Reed BR, et al. The measurement of everyday cognition (ECog): scale development and psychometric properties[J]. Neuropsychology, 2008, 22(4): 531-544.
[6]Tomaszewski Farias S, Mungas D, Harvey DJ, et al. The measurement of everyday cognition: development and validation of a short form of the everyday cognition scales[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2011,7(6): 593-601.
[7]Montine TJ, Phelps CH, Beach TG, et al. National Institute on AgingAlzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease: a practical approach[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2012, 123(1): 1-11.
[8]Cairns NJ, Bigio EH, Mackenzie IR, et al. Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2007, 114(1): 5-22.
[9]Deramecourt V, Slade JY, Oakley AE, et al. Staging and natural history of cerebrovascular pathology in dementia[J]. Neurology, 2012, 78(14): 1043-1050.
[10]Dickson DW, Braak H, Duda JE, et al. Neuropathological assessment of Parkinson’s disease: refining the diagnostic criteria[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8(12): 1150-1157.
[11]Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Bigio EH,  et al. Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2010, 119(1): 1-4.
[12]Vonsattel JP, Myers RH, Stevens TJ, et al. Neuropathological classification of Huntington’s disease[J]. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 1985, 44(6): 559-577.
[13]Trojanowski JQ, Revesz T, Neuropathology Working Group on MSA. Proposed neuropathological criteria for the post mortem diagnosis of multiple system atrophy[J]. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol, 2007, 33(6): 615-620.
[14]Thal DR, Rüb U, Orantes M, et al. Phases of A beta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD[J]. Neurology, 2002, 58(12): 1791-1800.
[15]Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, et al. Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2006, 112(4): 389-404.
[16]Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, et al. The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Neurology, 1991, 41(4): 479-486.

Funding

National natural science foundation of China;CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences
PDF(298 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/