大鼠肝硬化与肝再生的基因表达谱比较分析

秦志华;丁博;王改平;樊晋宇;杨军英;徐存拴;

解剖学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4) : 458-467.

欢迎访问《解剖学报》官方网站!今天是 English
解剖学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4) : 458-467. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1356.2012.04.005
细胞和分子生物学

大鼠肝硬化与肝再生的基因表达谱比较分析

  • 秦志华1; 丁博1; 王改平1; 樊晋宇2; 杨军英2; 徐存拴1,2*
作者信息 +

Comparative analysis of gene expression profiles between liver cirrhosis and liver regeneration in rats

Author information +
文章历史 +

Abstract

Objective To explore the relevance of rat liver cirrhosis (LC) to rat liver regeneration (LR). Methods The model of CCl4-induced LC was established by using 24 adult SD male rats (6 rats in each group). 114 adult SD male rats were randomly divided into 19 groups consisting of 9 partial hepatectomy groups, 9 sham operation groups and 1 normal control group, and 2/3 partial hepatectomy-induced LR was established. Then Rat Genome 230 2.0 array was used to detect gene expression profiles of livers tissues obtained from the above two models. Some methods of bioinformatics and systematic biology were applied to uncover the correlation of gene expression changes and physiological activities between the LC and LR. The reliability of the array data was confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results It was found that 304 genes were changed significantly in expression in rat LC occurrence and 948 genes in rat LR. Of them, 183 genes were the LC-specific, 827 genes were the LR-specific, and 121 genes were shared in both. H-clustering analysis demonstrated that physiological activities of LC had no correlation with those of LR in time. K-means cluster analysis revealed that gene expression trends of Cluster 1-5 (C1-5) groups were similar in LC and in LR, and that those of their C6 group were contrary with the gene expression changes of LR more abundant. Gene ontology(GO) classifications and functional cluster analysis found that physiological activities including immune and inflammatory response, cell migration and adhesion were increased both in LC and in LR, whereas various metabolic activities were decreased. Among them, reaction of liver to stimulation in LC was stronger than in LR in C 2, but in C 6 showed a contrary result. At the same time, DNA repair, cell proliferation, lipid metabolism, homeostasis, oxidation reduction etc in LC were weaker than in LR. BR>Conclusion The changes in gene expressions and physiological activities of LC and those of LR have not only similarities but also differences. BR>

关键词

肝硬化 / 肝再生 / Genome 230 2.0芯片 / 荧光定量PCR / 基因表达谱 / 大鼠

Key words

Liver cirrhosis / Liver regeneration / Genome 230 2.0 array / Fluorescence quantitative PCR / Gene expression profile / Rat

引用本文

导出引用
秦志华;丁博;王改平;樊晋宇;杨军英;徐存拴;. 大鼠肝硬化与肝再生的基因表达谱比较分析[J]. 解剖学报. 2012, 43(4): 458-467 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0529-1356.2012.04.005
Comparative analysis of gene expression profiles between liver cirrhosis and liver regeneration in rats[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2012, 43(4): 458-467 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0529-1356.2012.04.005
中图分类号: Q753   

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/