基于CT三维重建的中国人喙突形态学测量及临床意义

曾胜强 马丽 张磊* 汪国友 扶世杰 郭晓光 邓凯 暴丁溯

doi:10.16098/j.issn.0529.1356.2019.02.013

PDF(2172 KB)

解剖学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2) : 227-231. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529.1356.2019.02.013

解剖学

基于CT三维重建的中国人喙突形态学测量及临床意义

曾胜强^1,2 马丽³ 张磊^1,2* 汪国友^1,2 扶世杰^1,2 郭晓光^1,2 邓凯^1,2 暴丁溯^1,2

作者信息 +

Anatomical morphometry of the coracoid and its clinical significance inChniese population based on three-dimensional reconstruction of CT

ZENG Sheng-qiang ^1,2 MA Li³ ZHANG Lei ^1,2* WANG Guo-you ^1,2 FU Shi-jie ^1,2 GUO Xiao-guang ^1,2 DENG Kai ^1,2 BAO Ding-su ^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的通过对肩胛骨CT扫描三维重建，了解喙突的解剖形态学特点，为临床上相关疾病诊断和治疗提供解剖学依据。方法选取西南医科大学附属中医医院，因病情需要对肩胛骨行CT三维重建的256例患者影像学资料，并测量喙突相关解剖学数据，并进行对比和分析。结果统计了256例喙突三维重建模型的解剖学数据，测得喙突尖部的宽度为（14.31±2.71）mm，尖部的厚度为（8.79±1.44）mm，折返部的宽度为（22.87±2.82）mm，折返部的厚度为（14.68±2.39）mm，基底部的宽度为（26.29±3.05）mm，基底部的厚度为（10.71±3.01）mm，尖部到折返部的长度为（40.49±4.10）mm，折返部到基底部的长度为（19.36±2.35）mm。且在左右对比中发现，喙突尖厚度、折返部宽度、折返部到基底部长度差异存在显著性（P<0.05），而喙突的其他解剖形态差异无统计学意义（P> 0.05）。结论 CT三维重建能够全面准确地观察到喙突的解剖学结构，提供喙突解剖学参数。

Abstract

Objective To study the anatomical morphological features of coracoid process by 3D reconstruction of scapular CT, and to provide anatomic basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment of related diseases. Methods The imaging data of 256 patients with CT three-dimensional reconstruction of scapula were selected and the coracoid process related anatomical data were measured and compared and analyzed in the Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Southwest Medical University. Results The anatomical data of 256 cases of coracoid process reconstruction model were analyzed. The width of the tip of the coracoid process was (14.31±2.71) mm and the thickness of the apex was (8.79±1.44)mm. The width of the folded part was (22.87±2.82) mm, the thickness of the folded part was (14.68±2.39) mm, the width of the base was (26.29±3.05) mm, the length of the base was (10.71±3.01) mm, the length of the tip to the base was (19.36±2.35) mm. There were significant differences in the thickness of the coracoid tip, the width of the reentrant part and the length from the reentrant part to the base of the coracoid process (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in other anatomical morphology of the coracoid process (P>0.05). Conclusion Three-dimensional CT reconstruction can provide anatomical parameters of coracoid process and provide anatomic basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

导出引用

曾胜强马丽张磊汪国友扶世杰郭晓光邓凯暴丁溯. 基于CT三维重建的中国人喙突形态学测量及临床意义[J]. 解剖学报. 2019, 50(2): 227-231 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529.1356.2019.02.013

ZENG Sheng-qiang MA Li ZHANG Lei WANG Guo-you FU Shi-jie GUO Xiao-guang DENG Kai BAO Ding-su. Anatomical morphometry of the coracoid and its clinical significance inChniese population based on three-dimensional reconstruction of CT[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2019, 50(2): 227-231 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529.1356.2019.02.013

参考文献

［1］ Dong JM. Coracoid process in injury of shoulder suspension complex ［J］. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2018, 6 (1): 78. (in Chinese)

东靖明. 肩上方悬吊复合体损伤之喙突［J］. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(1): 78.

［2］ Zhu YM, Jiang ChY. A study on the consistency of CT classification system for evaluating the absorption of coracoid bone mass displaced after Latarjet operation ［J］. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2015, 3(1): 35-42. (in Chinese)

朱以明, 姜春岩. 评估Latarjet手术后移位喙突骨块吸收情况的CT分型系统的一致性研究［J］. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2015, 3(1): 35-42.

［3］ Ge Zh, Zhang XCh. Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation ［J］. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2017, 5(4): 308-312. (in Chinese)

葛喆, 张新潮. 肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗进展［J］. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2017, 5(4): 308-312.

［4］ Freehill MT, Srikumaran U, Archer KR, et al. The Latarjet coracoid process transfer procedure: alterations in the neurovascular structures ［J］. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(5): 695-700.

［5］ Sella GDV, Miyazaki AN, Nico MAC, et al. Study on the anatomic relationship between the clavicle and the coracoid process using computed tomography scans of the shoulder ［J］. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2017, 26(10): 1740-1747.

［6］ Xue C, Zhang M, Zheng TS, et al. Clavicle and coracoid process drilling technique for truly anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction ［J］. Injury, 2013, 44(10): 1314-1320.

［7］ Mohammed H, Skalski MR, Patel DB, et al. Coracoid process: the lighthouse of the shoulder ［J］. Radiographics, 2016, 36(7): 2084-2101.

［8］ Lian J, Dong L, Zhao Y, et al. Anatomical study of the coracoid process in Mongolian male cadavers using the Latarjet procedure ［J］. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11(1): 126.

［9］ Hardy A, Gerometta A, Granger B, et al. Preoperative CT planning of screw length in arthroscopic Latarjet ［J］. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(1): 24-30.

［10］ Chen YM, Hong JY, Bi DW, et al. Optimal computer-aided measurement of glenoid screw internal fixation through coracoid process ［J］. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2010, 41(1): 153-156. (in Chinese)

陈亿民, 洪俊毅, 毕大卫, 等. 经喙突肩胛骨关节盂螺钉内固定的最优化计算机辅助测量［J］. 解剖学报, 2010, 41(1): 153-156.

［11］ Tao ZhY, Cai LY, Yu XB, et al. Effect of coracoid plate position on the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation with triple endbutton ［J］. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2018, 6 (01): 30-37. (in Chinese)

陶振宇, 蔡乐益, 余贤斌, 等.喙突钢板位置对应用triple endobutton技术治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的影响［J］. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(01): 30-37.

［12］ Liu HZh, Qiu ChM, Liu ZhJ, et al. Characteristics of coracoid process Eyres Ⅴ fracture associated with injury of suspension complex above shoulder joint and analysis of surgical results ［J］. Chinese Journal of Reconstruction and Reconstruction Surgery, 2014, 28(12): 1469-1473. (in Chinese)

刘宏智, 邱长茂, 刘兆杰, 等. 喙突Eyres Ⅴ型骨折合并肩关节上方悬吊复合体损伤的特点及手术疗效分析［J］. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2014, 28(12): 1469-1473.

［13］ Jiang ChY. Arthroscopic treatment of unstable anterior shoulder ［J］. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2016, 4(4): 255. (in Chinese)

姜春岩. 肩关节前方不稳定的关节镜下治疗［J］. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2016, 4(4): 255.

［14］ Robinson CM, Al-Hourani, KMalley TS, et al. Anterior shoulder instability associated with coracoid nonunion in patients with a seizure disorder ［J］. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012, 94(7): e40.

［15］ Zhu Y, Jiang C, Song G, et al. Arthroscopic versus open latarjet in the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with marked glenoid bone loss: a prospective comparative study ［J］. Am J Sports Med, 2017, 45(7): 1645-1653.

［16］ Haeni DL, Opsomer G,Sood A, et al. Three-dimensional volume measurement of coracoid graft osteolysis after arthroscopic Latarjet procedure ［J］. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2017, 26(3): 484-489.

［17］ Zhong MJ, Lu W, Liu HF, et al. The modified arthroscopy double loop Latarjet technique in the treatment of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder joint ［J］. Chinese Shoulder and Elbow Surgical Journal, 2018, 6 (1): 38-46. (in Chinese)

钟名金, 陆伟, 柳海峰, 等. 改良关节镜双袢法Latarjet术治疗严重骨缺损的复发性肩关节前脱位［J］. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(1): 38-46.

［18］ He JM, Hui YM. Clinical effect and complications of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with Rockwood Ⅲ-Ⅴ hook plate ［J］. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2017, 5(4): 257-264. (in Chinese)

何洁铭, 惠耀敏. 急性肩锁关节脱位Rockwood Ⅲ-Ⅴ型应用钩钢板的临床效果及并发症探析［J］. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2017, 5(4): 257-264.

［19］ Rylander LS, Baldini T, Mitchell JJ, et al. Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: coracoid tunnel diameter correlates with failure risk ［J］. Orthopedics, 2014, 37(6): e531-535. ［20］ Campbell ST, Heckmann ND, Shin SJ, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of coracoid tunnel size and location for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction ［J］. Arthroscopy, 2015, 31(5): 825-830.

［21］ Grantham N, Heckmann N, Wang L, et al. A biomechanical assessment of a novel double endobutton technique versus a coracoid cerclage sling for acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular injuries ［J］. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(6): 1918-1924.

［22］ Lian JQ, Dong LL, Wei HT, et al. Anatomic characteristics of Chinese coracoid process and its application in Latajet procedure ［J］. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2015, 3(4): 233-237. (in Chinese)

连建强, 董乐乐, 魏海涛, 等. 国人喙突的解剖特点及在Latajet术的应用［J］. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2015, 3(4): 233-237.

［23］ Terra BB, Ejnisman B, de Figueiredo EA, et al. Anatomic study of the coracoid process: safety margin and practical implications ［J］. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(1): 25-30.

［24］ Dolan CM, Hariri S, Hart ND, et al. An anatomic study of the coracoid process as it relates to bone transfer procedures ［J］. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20(3): 497-501.

［25］ Zhang ZhH, Wang LB, Cui WM, et al. Anatomy of the safe area of scapula ［J］. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2017, 48(1): 65-79. (in Chinese)

张振华, 王立博, 崔雯铭, 等. 肩胛骨安全区的解剖［J］. 解剖学报, 2017, 48(1): 65-79.