超声内镜精准评估肿瘤起源及组织学特征可提高食管平滑肌瘤的手术疗效

谭学明 赵冉 孙永珍 高晓炎 招鹏 王燕 朱敏 李卫东

解剖学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6) : 966-971.

PDF(8213 KB)
欢迎访问《解剖学报》官方网站!今天是 English
PDF(8213 KB)
解剖学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6) : 966-971. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2021.06.021
解剖学

超声内镜精准评估肿瘤起源及组织学特征可提高食管平滑肌瘤的手术疗效

  • 谭学明 赵冉 孙永珍 高晓炎 招鹏 王燕 朱敏 李卫东*
作者信息 +

Endoscopic ultrasonography improving the operation effect for detecting precisely the origin and histology characteristics of esophageal leiomyoma

  • TAN Xue-ming ZHAO Ran  SUN Yong-zhen  GAO Xiao-yan  ZHAO Peng  WANG Yan  ZHU Min  LI Wei-dong*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的  探讨超声内镜评估肿瘤起源及组织学特征能否提高内镜下切除食管平滑肌瘤的手术疗效。   方法  回顾性分析2016年1月~2020年6月因食管黏膜下肿瘤于消化内科治疗并经病理证实为平滑肌瘤患者的临床资料。共58例食管平滑肌瘤患者接受术前超声内镜检查评估后进行内镜下切除。统计患者的肿瘤完整切除率、手术时间、住院时长及并发症发生情况。   结果  术前超声内镜提示,平滑肌瘤起源于黏膜肌层39例,固有肌层19例。瘤体平均直径1.50(0.2~6.5)cm,其中20例行内镜黏膜切除术(EMR),32例行内镜黏膜下挖除术(ESE),6例行黏膜下隧道内镜肿瘤切除术(STER)。总体完整切除率为96.6%。平均手术时间为38.29(15~100)min。术后并发症发生率15.5%(9/58),均经保守治疗后好转。在39例黏膜肌层起源平滑肌瘤中,20例行EMR,19例行ESE,两组患者的肿瘤大小及并发症发生上差异不显著,但EMR组的手术时间及患者术后住院天数明显更短(P<0.05)。在19例固有肌层起源平滑肌瘤中,13例行ESE,6例行STER,两组患者在肿瘤大小、手术时间、术后住院天数及并发症发生上差异均无显著统计学意义。   结论  术前超声内镜精准评估肿瘤起源及组织学特征可提高食管平滑肌瘤手术疗效。

Abstract

Objective  To investigate whether assessment of the tumor origin and histological features through endoscopic ultrasonography could improve the operative efficacy of endoscopic resection of esophageal leiomyoma.    Methods   The clinical data of patients with esophageal submucosal tumor who were treated in our department and diagnosed as leiomyoma pathologically from January 2016 to June 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. A total of 58 patients with esophageal leiomyoma underwent endoscopic resection following evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography. The en bloc resection rate, operation time, hospitalization day, and complications were evaluated.  Results  Preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography showed that leiomyoma originated from muscularis mucosa in 39 cases and muscularis propria in 19 cases. The mean tumor size was 1.50 (0.2-6.5) cm, and 20 cases underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 32 cases underwent endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE), and 6 cases underwent submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER). The overall en bloc rate was 96.6%. The mean operation time was 38.29 (15-100) min. The postoperative complication rate was 15.5% (9/58), and all were recovered after conservative treatment. Among the 39 cases originated from the muscularis mucosa, 20 cases underwent EMR and 19 cases underwent ESE. There were no significant differences in tumor size and complications between the two groups, but the operative time and the length of postoperative hospitalization in the EMR group were significantly shorter (P<0.05). Among the 19 patients originated from the muscularis propria, 13 cases underwent ESE and 6 cases underwent STER. Thee   were no significant differences in tumor size, operative time, the length of postoperative hospitalization and complications between the two groups.    Conclusion  Preoperastive endoscopic ultrasonography could precisely detect the origin and histology characteristics of esophageal leiomyoma and improves the operation effect.

关键词

 黏膜下肿瘤 / 起源 / 超声内镜 / 食管平滑肌瘤 / 内镜下切除术 /

Key words

Submucosal tumor / Tumor origin / Endoscopic ultrasonography / Esophageal leiomyoma / Endoscopic resection / Human

引用本文

导出引用
谭学明 赵冉 孙永珍 高晓炎 招鹏 王燕 朱敏 李卫东. 超声内镜精准评估肿瘤起源及组织学特征可提高食管平滑肌瘤的手术疗效[J]. 解剖学报. 2021, 52(6): 966-971 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2021.06.021
TAN Xue-ming ZHAO Ran SUN Yong-zhen GAO Xiao-yan ZHAO Peng WANG Yan ZHU Min LI Wei-dong. Endoscopic ultrasonography improving the operation effect for detecting precisely the origin and histology characteristics of esophageal leiomyoma[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2021, 52(6): 966-971 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2021.06.021
中图分类号: R615   

参考文献

[1] Zhang X, Patil D, Odze RD, et al. The microscopic anatomy of the esophagus including the individual layers, specialized tissues, and unique components and their responses to injury[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2018,1434(1):304-318.
[2] Lee LS, Singhal S, Brinster CJ, et al. Current management of esophageal leiomyoma[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2004,198(1):136-146.
[3] Nishida T, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S, et al. Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors[J]. Dig Endosc, 2013,25(5):479-489.
[4] Monig S, Chevallay M, Niclauss N, et al. Early esophageal cancer: the significance of surgery, endoscopy, and chemoradiation[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2018,1434(1):115-123.
[5] Chiu P, Yip HC, Teoh A, et al. Per oral endoscopic tumor (POET) resection for treatment of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019,33(4):1326-1333.
[6] Qi ZhP, Zhong YSh, Zhou PH, et al. Clinicopathological features of submucosal tumors in different upper gastrointestinal locations[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy, 2016, 33(6):362-366. (in Chinese)
齐志鹏, 钟芸诗, 周平红, 等. 上消化道不同部位黏膜下肿瘤的临床病理学特征[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2016,33(6):362-366.
[7] Liu BR, Liu BL, Wang XH, et al. Esophageal insufflation computed tomography for the diagnosis and management of esophageal submucosal tumors[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017,31(5):2350-2355.
[8] Guo J, Liu Z, Sun S, et al. Endosonography-assisted diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors[J]. Endosc Ultrasound, 2013,2(3):125-133.
[9] Lee HL. Advances in the management of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumor: pathologic diagnosis using endoscopy without endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy[J]. Clin Endosc, 2016,49(3):216-219.
[10] Peng JB, Ye LP, Mao XL, et al. Analysis of pathological features and distribution characteristics of 1237 upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion, 2019,39(2):94-99. (in Chinese)
彭金榜, 叶丽萍, 毛鑫礼, 等. 上消化道黏膜下肿瘤1237例次的病理学特征和分布特点[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2019,39(2):94-99.
[11] Chen Y, Wang M, Zhao L, et al. The retrospective comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal excavation for managing esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020,34(1):417-428.
[12] Xu H, Li Y, Wang F, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal leiomyoma: a ten-year single-institution experience[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018,28(9):1105-1108.
[13] Ye LP, Zhang Y, Luo DH, et al. Safety of endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: an analysis of 733 tumors[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2016,111(6):788-796.
[14] Chen T, Zhou PH, Chu Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors[J]. Ann Surg, 2017,265(2):363-369.
[15] Li QY, Meng Y, Xu YY, et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal tunneling dissection and thoracoscopic enucleation for the treatment of esophageal submucosal tumors[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2017,86(3):485-491.
[16] Chai N, Du C, Gao Y, et al. Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and video-assisted thoracoscopic enucleation for esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018,32(7):3364-3372.
[17] Surgical Group of Digestive Endoscopy Society of Chinese Medical Association, Digestive Endoscopy Professional Committee of Endoscopy Society of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Gastrointestinal Surgery Group of Surgery Society of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese consensus on endoscopic diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (version 2018) [J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy, 2018, 21(8):841-852. (in Chinese)
中华医学会消化内镜学分会外科学组, 中国医师协会内镜医师分会消化内镜专业委员会, 中华医学会外科学分会胃肠外科学组. 中国消化道黏膜下肿瘤内镜诊治专家共识(2018版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018,21(8):841-852.
[18] Cuesta MA, van der Wielen N, Weijs TJ, et al. Surgical anatomy of the supracarinal esophagus based on a minimally invasive approach: vascular and nervous anatomy and technical steps to resection and lymphadenectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017,31(4):1863-1870.
[19] Lu J, Jiao T, Zheng M, et al. Endoscopic resection of submucosal tumors in muscularis propria: the choice between direct excavation and tunneling resection[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014,28(12):3401-3407.
[20] Xiu H, Zhao CY, Liu FG, et al. Comparing about three types of endoscopic therapy methods for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2019,54(12):1481-1486.
[21] Faulx AL, Kothari S, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in subepithelial lesions of the GI tract[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2017,85(6):1117-1132.
[22] Tan Y, Lv L, Duan T, et al. Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for large esophageal leiomyoma originating from the muscularis propria layer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016,30(7):3121-3127.
[23] Onimaru M, Inoue H, Bechara R, et al. Clinical outcomes of per-oral endoscopic tumor resection for submucosal tumors in the esophagus and gastric cardia[J]. Dig Endosc, 2020,32(3):328-336.
[24] Dong T, Zhao L, Fan Z. Thoracoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for a giant esophageal leiomyoma[J]. Dig Endosc, 2019,31(5):590.
[25] Kanetaka K, Minami H, Kuroki T, et al. Successful resection of large esophageal leiomyoma by a combined thoracoscopic-endoscopic submucosal tunneling method[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2016,83(5):1027-1028.

PDF(8213 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/