高龄女性移植2枚或3枚卵裂期胚胎的临床效果比较

付磊; 周雯慧

doi:10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2021.01.018

PDF(3138 KB)

解剖学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1) : 113-117. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2021.01.018

组织学胚胎学发育生物学

高龄女性移植2枚或3枚卵裂期胚胎的临床效果比较

付磊周雯慧*

作者信息 +

Comparison of clinical outcome between 2 and 3 embryos transfer for elderly women

FU Lei ZHOU Wen-hui*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨移植2枚或3枚胚胎与临床结局的关系，为高龄女性胚胎移植数的选择提供依据。方法对80个卵裂期胚胎新鲜移植周期进行回顾性分析，根据移植胚胎数将这些周期分组，并对各组的临床妊娠率、种植率、多胎妊娠率及活产率进行比较。

结果对于年龄≥38岁的女性，当可利用胚胎数≥3枚时，移植2枚胚胎与移植3枚胚胎能够获得相似的临床妊娠率及活产率。这一趋势与所移植的8细胞胚胎数无关。结论高龄女性新鲜卵裂期胚胎移植数目不宜超过2枚。

Abstract

Objective To explore the relationship between clinical outcomes and embryo transfer number, and to provide some proposals for transfer selection of elderly patients. Methods Data from 80 fresh transfer cycles with cleavage-stage embryos were analyzed. Cycles were divided into several groups according to transfer number. Clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, multiple pregnancy rate and live birth rate were compared. Results To women no younger than 38 years old, when available embryo number was larger than two, similar clinical outcomes could be achieved by transferring two and three embryos. This trend was independent of the number of transferred 8-cell embryos. Conclusion The number of fresh cleavage-stage embryos transfer should not exceed two in elderly women.

导出引用

付磊周雯慧. 高龄女性移植2枚或3枚卵裂期胚胎的临床效果比较[J]. 解剖学报. 2021, 52(1): 113-117 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2021.01.018

FU Lei ZHOU Wen-hui. Comparison of clinical outcome between 2 and 3 embryos transfer for elderly women[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2021, 52(1): 113-117 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2021.01.018

中图分类号： R322.81

参考文献

［1］ Salvaing J, Peynot N, Bedhane MN, et al. Assessment of ‘one-step’ versus ‘sequential’ embryo culture conditions through embryonic genome methylation and hydroxymethylation changes［J］. Hum Reprod, 2016, 31(11):2471-2483.

［2］ Edwards RG, Purdy JM, Steptoe PC, et al. The growth of human preimplantation embryos in vitro［J］. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1981, 141(4):408-416.

［3］ Niakan KK, Han J, Pedersen RA, et al. Human pre-implantation embryo development［J］. Development, 2012, 139(5):829-841.

［4］ Chick JH, Wilson C, Summers-Chase D, et al. Pregnancy rates (PRs) according to embryo cell number at time of embryo transfer (ET) ［J］. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 28(2):73-77.

［5］ Liebermann J, Tweraser K, Blissing S, et al. Impact of the number of 8-cell embryos at fresh and frozen embryo transfer on the outcome with respect to the german embryo protection law［J］. Fertil Steril, 2003, 80(Suppl 3):174.

［6］ Alikani M, Calderon G, Tomkin G, et al. Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro［J］. Hum Reprod, 2000, 15(12):2634-2643.

［7］ Kong X, Yang S, Gong F, et al. The relationship between cell number, division behavior and developmental potential of cleavage stage human embryos: a time-lapse study［J］. PLoS One, 2015, 11(4): e0153697.

［8］ Kroener LL, Ambrtsumyan G, Pisarska MD, et al. Increased blastomere number in cleavage-stage embryos is associated with higher aneuploidy［J］. Fertil Steril, 2015, 103(3):694-698.

［9］ Kerin JF, Warnes GM, Quinn PJ, et al. Incidence of multiple pregnancy after in-vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer［J］. Lancet, 1983, 322(3):537-540.

［10］ Balaban B, Brison D, Calderon G, et al. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting［J］. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(6):1270-1283.

［11］ Gerris J. Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme［J］. Hum Reprod, 2002, 17(10):2626-2631.

［12］ Harbottle S, Hughes Ci, Cutting R, et al. Elective single embryo transfer: an update to UK Best Practice Guidelines［J］. Hum Fertil, 2015, 18(3):165-183.

［13］ Yang L, Cai S, Zhang S, et al. Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial［J］. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(5):869-876.

［14］ Liao H, Zhang S, Cheng D, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of human embryos and embryonic stem cells derived from monopronuclear zygotes［J］. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2009, 26(11-12):583-589.

［15］ Li M, Lin S, Chen Y, et al. Value of transferring embryos that show no evidence of fertilizaiton at the time of fertilization assessment［J］. Fertil Steril, 2015, 104(3):607-611.

［16］ Ergin EG, ?aliskan E, Yal?inkaya E, et al. Frequency of embryo multinucleation detected by time-lapse system and its impact on pregnancy outcome［J］. Fertil Steril, 2014, 102(4):1029-1033.

［17］ Wu L, Han W, Wang J, et al. Embryo culture using a time-lapse monitoring system improves live birth rates compared with a conventional culture system: a prospective cohort study［J］. Hum Fertil, 2017, 21(4):255-262.

［18］ Stigliani S, Anserini P, Venturini PL, et al. Mitochondrial DNA content in embryo culture medium is significantly associated with human embryo fragmentation［J］. Hum reprod, 2013, 28(10):2652-2660.