基于CT三维重建的成人第5掌骨的形态学及临床意义

邓玖征; 赵喆; 朱剑津; 程晓光; 马毅民; 潘勇卫

doi:10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2020.03.016

PDF(1681 KB)

解剖学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3) : 411-415. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2020.03.016

解剖学

基于CT三维重建的成人第5掌骨的形态学及临床意义

邓玖征¹ 赵喆¹朱剑津¹ 程晓光² 马毅民²潘勇卫^1*

作者信息 +

Morphology of the fifth metacarpal bone based on three-dimensional computed tomography image and its clinical significance

DENG Jiu-zheng¹ ZHAO Zhe¹ ZHU Jian-Jin¹ CHENG Xiao-guang² MA Yi-min² PAN Yong-wei^1*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的通过对成人第5掌骨CT三维重建数据进行测量，探讨人类第5掌骨形态学特点及临床意义，为临床手术和器械设计提供依据。方法对医学影像工作站内留存的114例第5掌骨CT扫描进行三维重建，基于三维模型测量第5掌骨长度、掌骨头半径、掌骨弓半径和1/2掌骨弓圆心角、掌骨头偏心距和偏心比及髓腔狭部内径。结果成人掌骨长度（51.55±3.01）mm，掌骨头半径（6.59±0.49）mm，掌骨弓半径（99.58±26.83）mm，1/2掌骨弓圆心角（15.90±3.36）°，掌骨头偏心距平均（0.49±0.26）mm，掌骨头偏心比平均（7.4±3.9）%，髓腔峡部内径平均（2.28±0.77）mm。结论男性掌骨长度、掌骨头半径、掌骨头偏心距及髓腔峡部内径大于女性，其余指标性别间差异无显著性；左右手之间差异也无显著性。

Abstract

Objective To discuss the morphological features of the fifth metacarpal bone and clinical significance by measuring the three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction model, and to improve the clinical technique and surgical instruments. Methods A total of 114 3-D reconstruction models based on computed tomography data of fifth metacarpal bone were created. The length, the radius of head, the radius of arc, the 1/2 central angle of arc, the distance of head offset, the ratio of head offset, the inner diameter of the isthmus of medullary space were measured based on 3-D models. Results The fifth metacarpal bone length was（51.55±3.01）mm. The radius of the fifth metacarpal head was (6.59±0.49）mm. The radius of the fifth metacarpal bone arc was（99.58±26.83）mm. The 1/2 central angle of fifth metacarpal bone arc was（15.90±3.36）°. The distance of the fifth metacarpal head offset was（0.49±0.26）mm. The ratio of head offset was（7.4±3.9）%. The inner diameter of the isthmus of medullary space was (2.28±0.77）mm. Conclusion The length, the radius of head, the distance of head offset, the inner diameter of the isthmus of medullary space are different between male and female, and the other parameters are not different. There is no significant difference between left and right hand.

导出引用

邓玖征赵喆朱剑津程晓光马毅民潘勇卫. 基于CT三维重建的成人第5掌骨的形态学及临床意义[J]. 解剖学报. 2020, 51(3): 411-415 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2020.03.016

DENG Jiu-zheng ZHAO Zhe ZHU Jian-Jin CHENG Xiao-guang MA Yi-min PAN Yong-wei. Morphology of the fifth metacarpal bone based on three-dimensional computed tomography image and its clinical significance[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2020, 51(3): 411-415 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2020.03.016

中图分类号： R323.7+1

参考文献

［1］ Nakashian MN, Pointer L, Owens BD, et al. Incidence of metacarpal fractures in the US population［J］. Hand (NY), 2012, 7(4):426-430.

［2］ Feehan LM, Sheps SB. Incidence and demographics of hand fractures in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study［J］. J Hand Surg Am, 2006, 31(7):1068-1074.

［3］ Hove LM. Fractures of the hand. Distribution and relative incidence［J］. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 1993, 27(4):317-319.

［4］ She Y, Xu Y. Treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures with antegrade single elastic intramedullary nailing ［J］. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2017, 18(1):238.

［5］ Zhu HY, Xu ZhY, Wei HF, et al. Locking plate alone versus in combination with two crossed kirschner wires for fifth metacarpal neck fracture［J］. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(46109):1-4.

［6］ Kim JK, Kim DJ. Antegrade intramedullary pinning versus retrograde intramedullary pinning for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures［J］. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2015, 473(5):1747-1754.

［7］ Winter M, Balaguer T, Bessiere C, et al. Surgical treatment of the boxer’s fracture: transverse pinning versus intramedullary pinning［J］. J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 2007, 32(6):709-713.

［8］ Sletten IN, Nordsletten L, Hjorthaug GA, et al. Assessment of volar angulation and shortening in 5th metacarpal neck fractures: an inter- and intra-observer validity and reliability study［J］. J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 2013, 38(6):658-666.

［9］ Leung YL, Beredjiklian PK, Monaghan BA, et al. Radiographic assessment of small finger metacarpal neck fractures［J］. J Hand Surg Am, 2002, 27(3):443-448.

［10］ Braakman M. Normal radiographic angulation in the 4th and 5th metacarpal: a reference guide［J］. Eur J Radiol, 1996, 22(1):38-41.

［11］ Singh Ⅰ. Torsion in metacarpal bones and bilateral asymmetry［J］. J Anat, 1979, 129(2):343-349.

［12］ Lamraski G, Monsaert A, De Maeseneer M, et al. Reliability and validity of plain radiographs to assess angulation of small finger metacarpal neck fractures: human cadaveric study［J］. J Orthop Res, 2006, 24(1):37-45.

［13］ Rivlin M, Kim N, Lutsky KF, et al. Measurement of the radiographic anatomy of the small and ring metacarpals using computerized tomographic scans［J］. Hand (NY), 2015, 10(4):756-761.

［14］ Moore DC, Crisco JJ, Trafton TG, et al. A digital database of wrist bone anatomy and carpal kinematics［J］. J Biomech, 2007, 40(11):2537-2542.

［15］ Singh I. Variations in the metacarpal bones ［J］. J Anat, 1959, 93(2):262-267.

［16］ Xia ZhSh. Morphology and diaphyseal nutrient foramen of the metacarpal bone［J］. Chinese Journal of Anatomy, 1984, 7(3):204,210,217.(in Chinese)

夏忠圣. 掌骨形态和掌骨体滋养孔［J］. 解剖学杂志, 1984, 7(3):204,210,217.

［17］ Liu FCh, Zhang Q, Chen ZhH. Radiologic measurement and sexual diagnosis of metacarpal bones by discriminant analysis［J］. Chinese Journal of Anatomy, 2003, 26(5): 495-497.(in Chinese)

刘丰春, 张庆, 陈忠恒. 掌骨的X线测量及其与身高的性别判别分析［J］. 解剖学杂志, 2003, 26(5):495-497.

［18］ Nuermaimaiti B, Dong JJ, Ai H, et al. Radiologic measurement and sexual diagnosis of metacarpal in Kazakh nationality by discriminant analysis［J］. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2010, 41(1):137-140.(in Chinese)

努尔买买提 ·巴哈夏尔, 董建江, 爱华, 等. 哈萨克族成人掌骨的X线测量及其与身高的性别判别分析［J］. 解剖学报, 2010, 41(1):137-140.