不同来源间充质干细胞表面标记的比较

杜志朋 李琼 殷国田 李苗苗 郭志坤

解剖学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 589-594.

PDF(649 KB)
欢迎访问《解剖学报》官方网站!今天是 English
PDF(649 KB)
解剖学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 589-594. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2019.05.008
细胞和分子生物学

不同来源间充质干细胞表面标记的比较

  • 杜志朋1 殷国田2 李苗苗1 郭志坤1 李琼1,3*
作者信息 +

Comparison of surface markers of mesenchymal stem cells from different sources

  • DU Zhi-peng1 YIN Guo-tian2 LI Miao-miao1 GUO Zhi-kun1 LI Qiong 1,3*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨人脐带间充质干细胞(HUCMSCs)、人脂肪间充质干细胞(ADSCs)和人经血源子宫内膜间充质干细胞(MenSCs)之间表面标记的差异及随培养代次增加表面标记的变化。 方法 分别将HUCMSCs、 ADSCs和MenSCs培养至第3、6、9、12代,用流式细胞术、免疫荧光法检测CD29、CD44、CD73、CD90、CD105、CD45的表达并进行比较。 结果 培养MenSCs和HUCMSCs呈纺锤状,ADSCs形态多样以梭型、多角形为主。流式细胞术检测显示,人HUCMSCs、ADSCs和MenSCs的第3代CD29、CD44、CD73和CD105阳性表达率均在95%以上,CD45阴性表达;第3代MenSCs CD90的表达率为(72.43±0.76)%,均低于其在HUCMSCs(99.67±0.12)%和ADSCs(99.70±0.15)%表达(P<0.001)。HUCMSCs、ADSCs和MenSCs随培养代次的增加表面标记CD29、CD44、CD73、CD90、CD105和CD45表达率差异无显著性(P>0.05)。免疫荧光结果与流式细胞术结果一致。 结论 HUCMSCs、ADSCs和MenSCs随培养时间的增加稳定高表达 CD29、CD44、CD73、CD90和CD105,不表达CD45,MenSCs的CD90表达率低于其在HUCMSCs和ADSCs的表达。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the expression difference of surface markers of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (HUCMSCs), human adipose mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) and human fetal blood source endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (MenSCs) and the changes of surface markers with the culture generation. Methods HUCMSCs, ADSCs and MenSCs were cultured to passage 3, 6, 9 and 12. Five MSC-specific markers, CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90 and CD105, and one HSC markers, CD45, were assessed by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. Results The cultured MenSCs and HUCMSCs were spindle-shaped, and the ADSCs forms were mainly spindle-shaped and multiple-angular. The results of flow cytometry showed that the MSC-positive markers including CD29, CD44, CD73 and CD105 were highly expressed by at least 95% in the passage 3 HUCMSCs, ADSCs and MenSCs cells and CD45 negative expression. Specifically, CD90 levels of MenSCs of passage 3 was (72.43±0.76)%, which was lower than that in HUCMSCs (99.67±0.12)% and ADSCs (99.70±0.15)%(P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the expression rates of surface markers CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105 and CD45 with the increase of culture passages in HUCMSCs, ADSCs and MenSCs (P>0.05). The results of immunofluorescence was consistent with those of flow cytometry.Conclusion With the increase of culture time, HUCMSCs, ADSCs and MenSCs are stable in high expression of CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90 and CD105, which does not express CD45, while the CD90 expression rate of MenSCs is lower than that in HUCMSCs and ADSCs.

关键词

人脐带间充质干细胞 / 人脂肪间充质干细胞 / 人经血源子宫内膜间充质干细胞 / 免疫荧光法 / 流式细胞术 /

Key words

Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell / Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell / Menstrual endometrial mesenchymal stem cell / Immunofluorescence / Flow cytometry / Human

引用本文

导出引用
杜志朋 李琼 殷国田 李苗苗 郭志坤. 不同来源间充质干细胞表面标记的比较[J]. 解剖学报. 2019, 50(5): 589-594 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2019.05.008
DU Zhi-peng YIN Guo-tian LI Miao-miao GUO Zhi-kun LI Qiong. Comparison of surface markers of mesenchymal stem cells from different sources[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2019, 50(5): 589-594 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2019.05.008

参考文献

 [1] Richardson SM, Kalamegam G, Pushparaj PN, et al.Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine: focus on articular cartilage and intervertebral disc regeneration[J]. Methods, 2016, 99: 69-80.
 [2] Pu L, Meng M, Wu J, et al.Compared to the amniotic membrane, Wharton's jelly may be a more suitable source of mesenchymal stem cells for cardiovascular tissue engineering and clinical regeneration[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2017, 8(1): 72.
 [3] Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, et al.Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies[J]. Tissue Eng, 2001, 7(2): 211-228.
 [4] Zannettino AC, Paton S, Itescu S, et al.Comparative assessment of the osteoconductive properties of different biomaterials in vivo seeded with human or ovine mesenchymal stem/stromal cells[J]. Tissue Eng Part A, 2010, 16(12): 3579-3587.
 [5] Yu X, Li Q, Ren MF, et al. Expression difference of surface markers between adipose derivedmesenchymal stem cells and bone marrow mesenchymalstem cells of the mouse[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica,2016,47(2): 203-208. (in Chinese)
余霞, 李琼, 任明芬, 等.小鼠脂肪源和骨髓源间充质干细胞表面标记表达的比较[J]. 解剖学报, 2016, 47(2): 203-208.
 [6] Gaebel R, Furlani D, Sorg H, et al.Cell origin of human mesenchymal stem cells determines a different healing performance in cardiac regeneration[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(2): e15652.
 [7] De Witte SFM, Peters FS, Merino A, et al.Epigenetic changes in umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells upon stimulation and culture expansion[J]. Cytotherapy, 2018, 20(7): 919-929.
 [8] Yang YK, Ogando CR, Wang See C, et al.Changes in phenotype and differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells aging in vitro[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2018, 9(1): 131.
 [9] Garcia-Olmo D, GarciaArranz M, Herreros D, et al.A phase Ⅰ clinical trial of the treatment of Crohn’s-fistula by adipose mesenchymal stem cell transplantation[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48(7): 1416-1423.
 [10]Wan Safwani WK, Makpol S, Sathapan S, et al.The changes of stemness biomarkers expression in human adipose-derived stem cells during long-term manipulation[J]. Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 2011, 58(4): 261-270.
 [11]Choi MR, Kim HY, Park JY, et al.Selection of optimal passage of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for stem cell therapy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2010, 472(2): 94-98.
 [12]Kim J, Kang JW, Park JH, et al.Biological characterization of long-term cultured human mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Arch Pharm Res, 2009, 32(1): 117-126.
 [13]Javazon EH, Beggs KJ, Flake AW.Mesenchymal stem cells: paradoxes of passaging[J]. Exp Hematol, 2004, 32(5): 414-425.
 [14]Park JS, Kim HY, Kim HW, et al.Increased caveolin-1, a cause for the declined adipogenic potential of senescent human mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Mech Ageing Dev, 2005, 126(5): 551-559.
 [15]Calloni R, Cordero EA, Henriques JA, et al.Reviewing and updating the major molecular markers for stem cells[J]. Stem Cells Dev, 2013, 22(9): 1455-1476.
 [16]Christ B, Pelz S.Implication of hepatic stem cells in functional liver repopulation[J]. Cytometry A, 2013, 83(1): 90-102.
 [17]Haasters F, Prall WC, Anz D, et al.Morphological and immunocytochemical characteristics indicate the yield of early progenitors and represent a quality control for human mesenchymal stem cell culturing[J]. J Anat, 2009, 214(5): 759-767.
 [18]Hao H, Chen G, Liu J, et al.Culturing on Wharton’s jelly extract delays mesenchymal stem cell senescence through p53 and p16INK4a/pRb pathways[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(3): e58314.
 [19]Joseph M, Das M, Kanji S, et al.Retention of stemness and vasculogenic potential of human umbilical cord blood stem cells after repeated expansions on PES-nanofiber matrices[J]. Biomaterials, 2014, 35(30): 8566-8575.
 [20]Zhang D, Kilian KA.The effect of mesenchymal stem cell shape on the maintenance of multipotency[J]. Biomaterials, 2013, 34(16): 3962-3969.
 [21]Elahi KC, Klein G, Avci-Adali M, et al.Human mesenchymal stromal cells from different sources diverge in their expression of cell surface proteins and display distinct differentiation patterns[J]. Stem Cells Int, 2016, 2016: 5646384.
 [22]Leblanc R, Lee SC, David M, et al.Interaction of platelet-derived autotaxin with tumor integrin alphaVbeta3 controls metastasis of breast cancer cells to bone[J]. Blood, 2014, 124(20): 3141-3150.
 [23]Peng ST, Su CH, Kuo CC, et al.CD44 crosslinking-mediated matrix metalloproteinase-9 relocation in breast tumor cells leads to enhanced metastasis[J]. Int J Oncol, 2007, 31(5): 1119-1126.
 [24]Wang Y, Li Q, Zhang SL, et al. Effect of CD73 on the proliferation and senescence of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Acta  Anatomic Sinica,2017,48(6): 669-674. (in Chinese)
王琰, 李琼, 张三林, et al.CD73对骨髓间充质干细胞增殖与衰老的影响[J]. 解剖学报, 2017, 48(6): 669-674.
 [25]Yao Y, Pan Y, Chen J, et al.Endoglin (CD105) expression in angiogenesis of primary hepatocellular carcinomas: analysis using tissue microarrays and comparisons with CD34 and VEGF[J]. Ann Clin Lab Sci, 2007, 37(1): 39-48.
 [26]Ishimura D, Yamamoto N, Tajima K, et al.Differentiation of adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction culture cells into chondrocytes using the method of cell sorting with a mesenchymal stem cell marker[J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2008, 216(2): 149-156.
 [27]Chang Y, Li C, Jia Y, et al.CD90+ cardiac fibroblasts reduce fibrosis of acute myocardial injury in rats[J]. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 2018, 96: 20-28.

基金

CD73通过Nanog促进脂肪间充质干细胞心肌分化和梗死心肌修复的功能与机制研究;脂肪间充质干细胞治疗心肌梗死机制研究;CD73+ADMSC通过CD73/腺苷轴促进梗死心肌修复的免疫调控机制研究

PDF(649 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/