大猩猩和现代人股骨颈截面形态对比分析

杜抱朴 张立召 赵凌霞*

doi:10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2018.05.018

PDF(271 KB)

解剖学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 666-670. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2018.05.018

人类学

大猩猩和现代人股骨颈截面形态对比分析

杜抱朴^1,2张立召¹ 赵凌霞^1*

作者信息 +

Comparison of femoral neck cross-sectional morphology between gorilla and human

DU Bao-pu ^{1, 2} ZHANG Li-zhao¹ ZHAO Ling-xia ^1*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨大猩猩和现代人股骨颈结构对不同行走方式的差异化适应。方法使用CT扫描9例大猩猩和18例现代人股骨标本，选取股骨颈内5处截面，测量截面几何形态参数。结果大猩猩和现代人股骨颈近端至远端截面内几何形态参数（如Ix/Iy、Zx/Zy和标准化骨密质面积）多呈增长趋势，但现代人标准化极截面抵抗矩除外。大猩猩股骨颈各截面内标准化骨密质面积和极截面抵抗矩均明显低于现代人。结论大猩猩和现代人股骨颈各截面内几何形态特征间的相似性可能与股骨颈作为悬臂梁结构相关，而差异性主要归因于不同行走方式所产生的载荷环境。现代人颈中部抗扭转强度和平均抗弯强度相对较低，可能是导致其股骨颈中部易发生骨折的原因之一。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the mechanical effect of different modes of locomotion on the whole femoral neck of the gorilla and human. Methods The femoral specimens of the gorilla（n=8）and human（n=18）were scanned by the computed tomography. We obtained five femoral neck slices from the base of the femoral head to the trochanteric line, and measured the crosssectional geometric properties. Results Cross-sectional geometric properties ［eg, Ix/Iy, Zx/Zy and standardized cortical area(CA)］ of the femoral neck were increasing from the proximal to distal portion, besides the standardized polar section modulus(Zp) of the human. The values of standardized CA and Zp were lower in the gorilla than the human. Conclusion The similarity and difference of cross-sectional geometric properties between the gorilla and human femoral neck, respectively, correspond to its structure character which acts as a cantilevered beam and the different load conditions during bipedal andquadrupedalwalking. Additionally, the polar section modulus of human mid-neck is significantly lower than other cross-sections, making it a fracture-prone region.

导出引用

杜抱朴张立召赵凌霞. 大猩猩和现代人股骨颈截面形态对比分析[J]. 解剖学报. 2018, 49(5): 666-670 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2018.05.018

DU Bao-pu ZHANG Li-zhao ZHAO Ling-xia. Comparison of femoral neck cross-sectional morphology between gorilla and human[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2018, 49(5): 666-670 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2018.05.018

参考文献

［1］Lovejoy CO. Evolution of human walking［J］. Sci Am, 1988, 259(5):118-125.

［2］Rafferty KL. Structural design of the femoral neck in primates ［J］. J Hum Evol, 1998, 34(4): 361-383.

［3］Demes B, Jungers WL, Walker C. Cortical bone distribution in the femoral neck of strepsirhine primates ［J］. J Hum Evol, 2000, 39(4): 367-379.

［4］Lieberman DE, Polk JD, Demes B. Predicting long bone loading from cross-sectional geometry ［J］. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2004, 123(2): 156-171.

［5］Ruff CB, Higgins R. Femoral neck structure and function in early hominins ［J］. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2013, 150(4): 512-525.

［6］Ruff CB. Body size,body shape,and long bone strength in modern humans ［J］. J Hum Evol, 2000, 38(2): 269-290.

［7］Ruff CB. Long bone articular and diaphyseal structure in Old World monkeys and apes.Ⅱ:estimation of body mass［J］. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2003, 120(1): 16-37.

［8］Ruff CB, Scott WW, Liu AYC. Articular and diaphyseal remodeling of the proximal femur with changes in body mass in adults［J］. Am J Phys Anthropol, 1991, 86(3): 397-413.

［9］Ohman JC, Krochta TJ, Lovejoy CO, et al. Cortical bone distribution in the femoral neck of hominoids: implications for the locomotion of Australopithecus afarensis ［J］.Am J Phys Anthropol, 1997, 104(1): 117-138.

［10］Lotz JC, Cheal EJ, Hayes WC. Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: implications for osteoporotic fracture［J］. Osteoporos Int, 1995, 5(4): 252-261.

［11］Liu AQ, Zhang YG, Wang ChSh, et al. The three-dimensional finite element analysis of the human femur ［J］. Journal of Xi’an Medical University, 2001, 22(3): 242-244. (in Chinese)

刘安庆,张银光，王春生，等.人股骨生物力学特征的三维有限元分析［J］.西安医科大学学报,2001,22(3):242-244.

［12］Li HF, Qi YB, Li Q, et al. ［J］. Progress in the surgical treatment of the femoral neck fractures in the elderly［J］. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2013, 33(3): 721-723. (in Chinese)

李海峰, 亓玉彬, 李强,等. 老年人股骨颈骨折手术治疗进展［J］. 中国老年学杂志, 2013, 33(3): 721-723.

［13］Zhuang HF, Li YZh, Lin JK, et al. Changes of bone mineral density and structural parameters of femoral neck in fragile femoral neck fracture［J］. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics, 2014, 33(3): 282-285. (in Chinese)

庄华烽, 李毅中, 林金矿,等. 脆性股骨颈骨折患者股骨颈骨密度及结构的变化［J］. 中华老年医学杂志, 2014, 33(3): 282-285.

［14］Zhang YL, Tang ML, Zhou X, et al. Age-related reference value of the femoral neck geometric parameters in females［J］. Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis, 2017, 23(6): 751-756. (in Chinese)

张云林, 汤梦露, 周祥, 等. 女性年龄相关的股骨颈几何参数参考值［J］. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2017, 23(6):751-756.

［15］Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui L, et al. BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the study of osteoporotic fractures［J］. J Bone Miner Res, 2003, 18(11): 1947-1954.

［16］Holzer G, Von SG, Holzer LA, et al. Hip fractures and the contribution of cortical versus trabecular bone to femoral neck strength［J］. J Bone Miner Res, 2009, 24(3): 468-474.

［17］Zhou YS, Wang ZhJ, Qin SH. Analysis of femoral neck fracture ［J］. Journal of Practical Orthopaedics, 2004, 5(10): 426-428. (in Chinese)

周育松,王振军,秦泗河.股骨颈骨折研究［J］.实用骨科杂志,2004,5(10):426-428.