Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类骨质植入深度对平台转换种植体周围骨应力分布影响的有限元分析

付宏宇 陈楠 冯广智

解剖学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 258-263.

PDF(881 KB)
欢迎访问《解剖学报》官方网站!今天是 English
PDF(881 KB)
解剖学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 258-263. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2018.02.020
生物工程学

Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类骨质植入深度对平台转换种植体周围骨应力分布影响的有限元分析

  • 付宏宇1 陈楠1 冯广智2*
作者信息 +

Finite element analysis of the effect of implantation depth on the distribution of bone stress around the platform switching implant according to type Ⅱ and Ⅲ bone

  • FU Hong-yu1 CHEN Nan1 FENG Guang-zhi 2*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 比较植体不同植入深度时Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类骨质中种植体周围牙槽骨应力分布特征,指导临床选择合适的种植方案以均衡应力分布。 方法 利用Abaqus 6.13分别绘制下颌后牙区牙槽骨骨块与Straumann骨水平种植体模型以及下颌第一磨牙的牙冠简化模型。分别加载垂直向200 N、水平向20 N的载荷,观察不同植入深度下种植体周围骨皮质的最大应力和应力分布特征。 结果 当平台转换种植体上表面与骨皮质上表面相平时,可以观察到种植体周围骨组织最大von Mises应力(MVMS)位于骨皮质表面,随着种植体植入深度的增加,骨皮质内MVMS也随之移动,基本保持在种植体上表面周围的骨皮质内,并在种植体上表面位于骨皮质一半厚度时达到MVMS的最低值。 结论 Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类骨质平台转换种植体周围骨MVMS出现于种植体周围皮质骨内,皮质骨的应力集中则主要位于与颈部平台接触区,调整种植体植入深度可以改变皮质骨中应力集中位置。种植体上表面位于牙槽嵴下水平时,有利于减轻牙槽嵴顶皮质骨的应力。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the Platform Switching implant-supported denture in posterior mandibular area, to compare the maximal stress value of the bone around the implant with the implant depth, and to use the stress distribution around the implants to guide the clinical selection of appropriate planting program. Methods A simplified model of the alveolar bone in the posterior region of the mandible was drawn using Abaqus 6.13. The simplified model of the straight crown of the mandibular first molar was obtained with the Straumann bone-level implant. Abaqus CAE 6.13 was used to perform finite element analysis to observe the maximal stress of the cortical bone around the implant in different implant depths. The maximal stress of the cortical bone around the implant was measured at different implant depths. Results The maximal Von Mises stress (MVMS) of the bone around the implant was observed on the surface of the cortical bone when the upper surface of the implant was shifted to the upper surface of the cortical bone. With the increase of implant depth, the MVMS in the cortical bone moved along the cortical bone around the upper surface of the implant and reached the minimum value of MVMS when the upper surface of the implant was located a half thickness of the cortical bone. Conclusion Bone stress around the platform switching implant MVMS appeared in the peri-implant cortical bone. The stress concentration of the cortical bone was mainly located in the contact area with the neck platform. Adjusting the implant depth could change the stress concentration in the cortical bone. The upper surface of the implant is located below the level of the alveolar ridge, which helps to relieve the stress of the alveolar crest cortical bone.

关键词

有限元分析 / 种植 / 平台转换 / 应力分布

Key words

Finite element analysis / Implant / Platform switching / Stress distribution

引用本文

导出引用
付宏宇 陈楠 冯广智. Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类骨质植入深度对平台转换种植体周围骨应力分布影响的有限元分析[J]. 解剖学报. 2018, 49(2): 258-263 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2018.02.020
FU Hong-yu CHEN Nan FENG Guang-zhi. Finite element analysis of the effect of implantation depth on the distribution of bone stress around the platform switching implant according to type Ⅱ and Ⅲ bone[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2018, 49(2): 258-263 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2018.02.020

参考文献

[1]Sailer l, Muhlemann S, Zwahlen M, et al. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions:a systematic review of the survival and complication rates[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012,23 (Suppl 6):163-201.
 [2]Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses after a mean observation period of at least 5 years[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2012,23 (Suppl 6):22-38.

 [3]Pjetursson BE, Asgerirsson AG, Zwahlen M, et al. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade:comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29 (Suppl):308-324.

 [4]Wang HY. Measurments and statistics of human teeth in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology,1959, 7(3):149-155. (in Chinese)

王惠芸.我国人牙的测量和统计[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 1959,7(3):149-155. 
 [5]Chen XY, Chen SL, Zhang MCh. Influence of bone quality on the stress distribution for three-posterior immediately loaded implant:a three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 2011, 46(4):233-236. (in Chinese)
陈霞云,陈松龄, 张美超.下颌后牙区不同骨质内种植体即刻负载的三维有限元分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志,2011,46(4):233-236. 
 [6]Moon SY, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant[J]. J Adv prosthodont, 2017, 9(1):31-37.
 [7]Bayraktar M, Gultekin BA, Yalcin S, et al. Effect of crown to implant ratio and implant dimensions on periimplant stress of splinted implant-supported crowns: a finite element analysis[J]. Implant Dent, 2013, 22(4): 406-413.
 [8] Koka P, Mohapatra A, Anandapandian PA, et al. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis[J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2012, 23(2): 129-134.
 [9]Bacchi A, Consani RL, Mesquita MF, et al. Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2013, 71(5): 1243-1249.
 [10]Bouazza-Juanes K, Martinez-Gonzalez A, Peiro G, et al. Effect of platform switching on the peri-implant bone:A finite element study[J].J Clin Exp Dent, 2015,7(4):e483-e488.
 [11]Kang FW, Lu J, Pan KF. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different cortical bone thickness on stress distribution in implant area[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science),2006,27(1):31-33. (in Chinese)
康非吾,卢军,潘可凤.种植区骨皮质厚度对种植体骨界面应力分布的影响[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2006,27(1):31-33. 
 [12]Maeda Y, Miura J, Taki I, et al. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale[J]? Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007,18(5):581-584.
 [13] Gehrke P, Dhom G, Brunner J, et al. Zirconium in implant abutments fracture strenhth and influence of cyclic loading on retaining-screw loosening[J].Quintessence Int, 2006,37(1):19-26.
 [14]Wu AY, Lung H, Huang HL, et al. Biomechanical investigations of the expanded platform switching concept in immediately loaded small diameter implants[J].J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 115(1):20-25.
 [15]Pessoa RS, Bezerra FJ, Sousa RM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols[J].J Periodontol, 2014, 85(9):1161-1171.
 [16]Luo J, Hu XL, Lin Y, et al. Influence of the placing depth of implants with plantform switching on the marginal bone level in the posterior mandible:a clinical study[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences),2012,44(1):65-69. (in Chinese)
罗佳,胡秀莲,林野,等.下后牙区平台转移设计种植体植入深度对边缘骨水平影响的临床研究[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2012,44(1):65-69. 

PDF(881 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/