肩胛骨关节盂的位置数据测量及其临床意义

徐高磊 许路阳 张振华 王浩人 高文涛 马钊*

doi:10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2016.05.016

PDF(228 KB)

解剖学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 670-671. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2016.05.016

解剖学

肩胛骨关节盂的位置数据测量及其临床意义

徐高磊¹许路阳² 张振华¹ 王浩人² 高文涛¹ 马钊^1*

作者信息 +

Positioning data evaluation and clinical significance of the scapula glenoid

XU Gao-lei¹ XU Lu-yang² ZHANG Zhen-hua¹ WANG Hao-ren² GAO Wen-tao¹MA Zhao ^1*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的利用肩胛骨上较为明显的3个点获得关节盂的位置数据，从而分析出肱骨头和关节盂之间的力传递关系，为肩部运动障碍的治疗提供依据。方法选取干燥的标本68例，经过测量，计算出肩胛骨上3个可触及的点所决定的平面与关节盂中心和前两个点所决定的平面所形成的角（临界角θ），这个临界角θ可以让我们从肩胛骨上3个明显的点获得关节盂的位置数据。结果经过测量，计算得到θ值的范围为(31.36±4.65)°。结论可利用已知的θ和肩胛骨上3个较为明显的点来计算跨肩关节的力，从而为肩部运动障碍的患者优化加强锻炼的选择。

Abstract

Objective To obtain glenoid positioning data from the positions of three palpable points on scapula, in order to analyze force transmission between the humeral head and the glenoid for the therapy of dyskiness in the shoulder joint. Methods Dry scapulae(N=68)were measured and a critical angle θ which relates the plane determined by the three palpable points on the scapula to a plane containing the glenoid center and the first two palpable points was calculated. The position of glenoid by using the critical angle and scapular palpable points was obtained. Results The mean value for θ was (32.36±4.65)°. Conclusion The obtained θ allows us to determine the position of the glenoid from three palpable points. This information may be used in calculation of forces across the shoulder joint, which in turn allows optimizing the choice of strengthing exercises in patients with dyskiness.

导出引用

徐高磊许路阳张振华王浩人高文涛马钊. 肩胛骨关节盂的位置数据测量及其临床意义[J]. 解剖学报. 2016, 47(5): 670-671 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2016.05.016

XU Gao-lei XU Lu-yang ZHANG Zhen-hua WANG Hao-ren GAO Wen-tao MA Zhao. Positioning data evaluation and clinical significance of the scapula glenoid[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2016, 47(5): 670-671 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2016.05.016

参考文献

［1］McClure PW, Michener LA, Sennett BJ, et al. Direct 3-dimensional measurement of scapular kinematics during dynamic movements in vivo［J］. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2001, 10(3): 269-277.
［2］Kibler WB, Sciascia A, Wilkes T. Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to shoulder injury［J］. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2012, 20(6): 367-372.
［3］von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Hinterwimmer S, Braune C, et al. MR-based 3D-analysis of the pathomechanics of traumatic and atraumatic shoulder instability［J］. Z Orthopadie Ihre Grenzgeb, 2005, 143(4): 461-467.
［4］Page P. Shoulder muscle imbalance and subacromial impingement syndrome in overhead athletes［J］. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2011, 6(1): 51-58.
［5］Lewis GS, Bryce CD, Davison AC, et al. Location of the optimized centerline of the glenoid vault: a comparison of two operative techniques with use of three-dimensional computer modeling［J］. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(5):1188-1194.
［6］Beaulieu CF, Hodge DK, Bergman AG, et al. Glenohumeral relationships during physiologic shoulder motion and stress testing: initial experience with open MR imaging and active imagingplane registration［J］. Radiology, 1999, 212(3): 699-705.
［7］Ludewig PM, Hassett DR, Laprade RF, et al. Comparison of scapular local coordinate systems［J］. Clinical Biomechanics, 2010, 25(5): 415-421.
［8］Sobotta J. Atlas of Descriptive Human Anatomy［M］. 6th ed. New York :Hafner Publishing, 1954:115-119.
［9］Friedman RJ, Hawthorne KB, Genez BM. He use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version［J］. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1992,74(7):1032-1037.