欢迎访问《解剖学报》官方网站！今天是
English
髋臼骨折不同台阶状移位及程度对髋关节接触特性的影响
Biomechanical consequences of different step-off displacement and degree of acetabular fractures
目的 模拟累及关节面负重区的髋臼骨折，分别对不同方向旋转所形成的台阶状移位进行生物力学研究，以了解应力分布及接触面积等的改变情况。方法 分别测量10个完整髋臼 (I组)、解剖复位（K组）、不同台阶移位（A组：1mm；B组：2mm；C组:3mm；D组：4mm；a组：-1mm；b组：-2mm；c组:-3mm；d组：-4mm）时髋臼与股骨头之间的接触特性。所获数据经统计学分析软件进行分析比较差异。 结果 完整髋臼负重时接触面积总面积为（7.59±4.42）cm2；K组髋臼以及A组移位髋臼保持了髋臼的解剖形态，未引起髋臼接触面积显著变化。其余类型移位均造成髋臼骨折总接触面积减小(P<0.05)。负重区的接触面积在完整髋臼时为（3.72±0.04）cm2，骨折后也使之减小。解剖复位组负重区接触面积为（3.64±0.87）cm2（与完整髋臼负重区面积相比 P>0.05），当内旋使台阶移位达到3mm或更大，外旋移位台阶移位到3mm或更大时，负重区接触面积显著减小。 结论 髋臼骨折产生的台阶状移位改变了正常髋关节的生物力学特性，使髋关节的接触面积发生了重新分布。
Objective To study biomechanical effect of different direction of the step-off caused by rotational displacement involving in the weight-bearing articular area of acetabular fracture, and to reveal the distribution and variation of stress and contact area. Methods Ten acetabular specimens were included in the study. The image information of the pressure-sensitive film after loading was scanned into the computer and analyzed by a contact pressure measurement software to calculate the area of contact. Intact（group I）, anatomical（group K）and different level of step-off (group A: 1mm; group B: 2mm; group C: 3mm; D group: 4mm; Group a:-1mm; group b:-2mm, group c: -3mm, group d: -4mm) acetabular frature were measured for contact characteristics between the acetabulum and femoral head. The data were analyzed by SPSS19.0 statistical analysis software. Results The contact area of intact acetabulum was （7.59±4.42）cm2. Anatomical reduction group and group A generally had the normal structure of acetabulum and did not change the contact area significantly. The other groups caused significantly decrease of the contact area (P<0.05). The contact area of superior region in intact acetabulum was (3.72±0.04) cm2, which was decreased after fracture. The pronation step-off reached 3mm or greater and supination step-off 3mm or more, superior region contact area significantly reduced. Conclusion Step-off displacement caused by acetabular fractures changes the biomechanical properties of normal hip joint and significantly alters the distribution the contact area.
髋臼 / 关节面 / 台阶状 / 生物力学 / 应用解剖学 / 人
Acetabulum / Articular surface / Step-off / Biomechanics / Applied anatomy / Human
［1］Hong GQ, Wang G. Research progress of screw for acetabular fractures［J］. Chinese Journal of Trauma, 2014,30(2):190-192. (in Chinese)
洪顾麒, 王钢. 螺钉治疗髋臼骨折的研究进展［J］. 中华创伤杂志, 2014,30(2):190-192.
［2］Letournel E.Acetabulum fractures: classification and management［J］. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1980, (151): 81-106.
［3］Olson SA, Bay BK, Pollak AN, et al. The effect of variable size posterior wall acetabular fractures on contact characteristics of the hip joint ［J］. J Orthop Trauma, 1996, 10(6): 395-402.
［4］Wang QX, Zhang YZ, Pan JSh, et al. The stress distribution in the dome region of acetabulum after transverse acetabular fractures treated with different fixations［J］. Chinese Journal of Trauma, 2004, 20(12): 743-746. (in Chinese)
王庆贤, 张英泽, 潘进社, 等. 髋臼横断骨折不同内固定方法臼顶负重区的应力分布［J］. 中华创伤杂志, 2004, 20(12): 743-746.
［5］Fan JH. Development of contact pressure measurement system based on pressure sensitive film and its application in human joint pressure analysis［D］.First Military Medical University,2001. (in Chinese)
樊继宏. 基于压敏片材料的接触压力测量系统的研制及其在人体关节压力分析中的应用 ［D］. 第一军医大学, 2001.
［6］Hak DJ, Hamel AJ, Bay BK, et al. Consequences of transverse acetabular fracture malreduction on load transmission across the hip joint ［J］. J Orthop trauma, 1998, 12(2): 90-100.
［7］Matta JM. Operative treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach: a 10-year perspective［J］. J Orthop Trauma, 2006, 20(1 Suppl): S20-S29.
［8］Malkani AL, Voor MJ, Rennirt G, et al. Increased peak contact stress after incongruent reduction of transverse acetabular fractures: a cadaveric model ［J］. J Trauma, 2001, 51(4): 704-709.
［9］Chapurlat RD, Gensburger D, Jimenez-Andrade JM, et al. Pathophysiology and medical treatment of pain in fibrous dysplasia of bone［J］. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2012, 7 Suppl 1:S3.
［10］Kohbe P，Hockertz I，Sellei RM，et al.Minimally invasive stabilization of posterior pelvic—ring instabilities with a transiliae locked compression plate［J］.Int Orthop，2012，36(1)：159-164.
［11］Liu Y, Wei ShSh, Li GQ, et al. The establishment and significance of three-dimensional finite element model of acetabular fracture after operation［J］.Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery，2012，29（2）：336-338.(in Chinese)
刘勇，魏帅帅，李国庆，等.髋臼骨折术后个体化三维有限元模型的建立［J］.中华实验外科杂志，2012，29（2）：336-338.
［12］Wang G. Rethinking on the treatment of pelvic and acetabular fractures ［J］. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma,2014,36(5):369-370. (in Chinese)
王钢.关于骨盆与髋臼骨折治疗的再思考［J］.中华创伤骨科杂志,2014,36(5):369-370.
髋臼双柱骨折不同移位方式及程度的生物力学影响
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
