改良差时贴壁法分离培养鉴定小鼠骨髓间充质干细胞和内皮前体细胞

冯文磊 张猛 印双红 徐芳洁 王艳杰 陈雪玲 吴向未*

解剖学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2) : 282-288.

欢迎访问《解剖学报》官方网站!今天是 English
解剖学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2) : 282-288. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2015.02.023
技术方法

改良差时贴壁法分离培养鉴定小鼠骨髓间充质干细胞和内皮前体细胞

  • 冯文磊1 张猛1 印双红2 徐芳洁2 王艳杰1 陈雪玲2 吴向未1*
作者信息 +

Isolation, cultivation and identification of mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells from murine bone marrow with a modified differential adhesion method

  • FENG Wen-lei1 ZHANG Meng1 YIN Shuang-hong2 XU Fang-jie2 WANG Yan-jie1 CHEN Xue-ling2 WU Xiang-wei 1*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探索同时从小鼠骨髓分离培养间充质干细胞(MSCs)与内皮前体细胞(EPCs)及对其鉴定的方法。方法 小鼠骨髓细胞经改良差时贴壁法分离,以48h为时间点,48h内贴壁细胞传至3代后行成骨、成软骨、成脂分化诱导实验,流式细胞术(FCM)检测其表面标记;48h后收集未贴壁细胞,传至3代后行血管形成实验,传至5代后行CD31免疫荧光细胞染色实验,FCM检测其表面标记。 结果 第3代48h内贴壁细胞可诱导分化为骨、软骨和脂肪细胞,FCM 检测Sca-1、CD29、CD45、CD11b 阳性率分别为(98.30±0.75)%,(97.47±1.32)%,(1.87±0.15)%,(1.03±0.71)%;第3代48h后贴壁细胞在基质胶上可形成血管样结构,第5代48h后贴壁细胞特异性表面抗原CD31呈阳性表达,FCM检测CD34、CD133、血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGFR2) 阳性率分别为(88.90±1.18)%,(92.73±2.90)%,(87.63±1.79)%。 结论 采用改良差时贴壁法可同时分离培养扩增小鼠骨髓 MSCs和 EPCs,且简便高效稳定可重复。

Abstract

Objective To establish a method for simultaneously isolating, culturing and identifing of murine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) from bone marrow. Methods The cells were isolated by a modified differential adhesion method from murine bone marrow and cultured for 48 hours. The primary adherent cells at 48 hours were cultured in LG-DMEM and the non-adhered cells were collected and induced by EGM-2MV complete medium in human fibronectin-coated dishes. Osteogenic, chondrogenic,and adipogenic induced multi-directional differentiation potentials were performed on the primary adherent cells, their immune phenotypes were detected by flow cytometry (FCM).Tube formation experiment on the matrigelin vitro and the expression of specific surface marker CD31 determined by immunofluoresence cell staining were identified for the subsequent adherent cells, and their immune phenotypes were detected by FCM.
Results The passage 3 of the primary adherent cells were identified by induced differentiation into osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondrocytes after induction. The expression levels of Sca-1, CD29, CD45, and CD11b were (98.30±0.75)%, (97.47±1.32 )% , (1.87±0.15)% and (1.03±0.71)% respectively. The passage 3 of the subsequent adherent cells were cultured on Matrigel, which resulted in the formation of tube-like structures.The expression of the passage 5 of the subsequent adherent cells specific surface marker CD31 was positive. The expression levels of CD34, CD133 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor(VEGFR)2 were (88.90±1.18 )% , (92.73±2.90)%, and (87.63±1.79 )% respectively. Conclusions The modified differential adhesion is an efficient, stable, and replicable method that can simultaneously isolate and amplify mouse bone marrow MSCs and EPCs.

关键词

间充质干细胞 / 内皮前体细胞 / 骨髓 / 改良差时贴壁分离法 / 流式细胞术 / 小鼠

Key words

Mesenchymal stem cells / Endothelial progenitor cells / Bone marrow / Modified differential adhesion method / Cell culture / Flow cytometry / Mouse

引用本文

导出引用
冯文磊 张猛 印双红 徐芳洁 王艳杰 陈雪玲 吴向未*. 改良差时贴壁法分离培养鉴定小鼠骨髓间充质干细胞和内皮前体细胞[J]. 解剖学报. 2015, 46(2): 282-288 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2015.02.023
FENG Wen-lei ZHANG Meng YIN Shuang-hong XU Fang-jie WANG Yan-jie CHEN Xue-ling WU Xiang-wei*. Isolation, cultivation and identification of mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells from murine bone marrow with a modified differential adhesion method[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica. 2015, 46(2): 282-288 https://doi.org/10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2015.02.023

参考文献

[1]Laine SK,Hentunen T,Laitala-Leinonen T. Do microRNAs regulate bone marrow stem cell niche physiology[J].Gene,2012,497(1): 1-9.
[2]Ghannam S,Bouffi C,Djouad F, et al. Immunosuppression by mesenchymal stem cells: mechanisms and clinical applications[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther,2010 ,1(1): 2.
[3]Wu X, Pang L, Lei W, et al. Inhibition of Sca-1 positve skeletal stem cell recruitment by alendronate blunts the anabolic effects of parathyroid hormone on bone remodeling[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2010,7(5): 571-580.
[4]Abouelfetouh A, Kondoh T, Ehara K, et al. Morphological differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells into neuron like cells after co-culture with hippocampal slice[J]. Brain Res, 2004,1029(1):114-119.
[5]Sasaki M, Abe R, Fujita Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells are recruited into wounded skin and contribute to wound repair by transdifferentiation into multiple skin cell type[J]. Immunol, 2008,180(4):2581-2587.
[6]Chivu M, Dima SO, Stancu CI, et al. In vitro hepatic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells under differential exposure to liver-specific factors[J].Transl Res, 2009,154(3):122-132.
[7]Yan X, Lv A, Xing Y, et al. Inhibition of p53-p21 pathway promotes the differentiation of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into cardiomyocytes[J]. Mol Cell Biochem,2011, 354(1-2):21-28.
[8]Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al.Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis[J]. Science,1997,275(5302):964-967.
[9]Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, et al.Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC 133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors [J]. Blood,2000,95(3):952-958. 
[10]Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JP,et al. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk[J]. N Engl J Med,2003,348(7):593-600.
[11]Friedenstein AJ, Gorskaja JF, Kulagina NN. Fibroblast precursors in normal and irradiatedm ouse hematopoietic organs[ J]. Exp Hematol, 1976, 4(5) : 267-274.
[12]Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, et al. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization[J]. Circ Res, 1999(3);85:221-228.
[13]Tongers J, Roncalli JG, Losordo DW. Role of endothelial progenitor cells during ischemia-induced vasculogenesis and collateral formation [J]. Microvasc Res, 2010,79(3):200-206.
[14]Morikawa S,Mabuchi Y,Kubota Y,et al.Prospective identification,isolation and systemic transplantation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells in murine bone marrow[J].Exp Med,2009,206(11):2483-2496.
[15]Palladino M, Gatto l, Neri V, et al. Combined therapy with sonic hedgehog gene transfer and bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells enhances angiogenesis and myogenesis in the ischemic skeletal muscle[J]. J Vasc Res, 2012,49(5):425-431.
[16]Kagami H, Agata H, Tojo A. Bone marrow stromal cells (bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells) for bone tissue engineering: basic science to clinical translation[J]. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 2011,43(3):286-289.
[17]Song ZhSh, Bai ShL, Pan F,et al.Compatibility study of bone mesenchymal stem  cells and ferulic acid treatment PHBV film in vitro[J].Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2014,45(1):47-52.(in Chinese)
 宋章硕,柏树令,潘峰,等.骨髓间充质干细胞与阿魏酸处理的PHBV膜的体外相容性[J].解剖学报,  2014,45(1):47-52.
[18]Casamassimi A, Balestrieri ML, Fiorito C, et al. Comparison between total endothelial progenitor cell isolation versus enriched CD133+culture[J]. J Biochem,  2007,141(4):503-511.
[19]Lee JW,Gupta N,Serikov V,et al. Potential application of mesenchymal stem cells in acute lung injury[J]. Expert Opin Biol Ther,2009, 9(10) : 1259-1270.
[20]Sen S,McDonald S,Coates P,et al. Endothelial progenitor cells: novel biomarker andpromising cell therapy for cardiovascular disease[J]. Clin Science,2011,120(7): 263-283.
[21]Navarro-Sobrino M,Hernández-Guillamon M,Fernandez-Cadenas I,et al.The angiogenic gene profile of circulating endothelial progenitor cells from ischemic stroke patients[J].Vasc cell,2013,5(1):3.
[22]Li Q, Wang Z. Influence of mesenchymal stem cells with endothelial progenitor cells in co-culture on osteogenesis and angiogenesis: an in vitro study[J].Arch Med Res ,2013 ,44(7):504-513.
[23]Barber CL, Iruela-Arispe ML. The ever-elusive endothelial progenitor cell: identities, functions and clinical implications[J]. Pediatr Res, 2006,59(4Pt 2):26R-32R. 

基金

血管内皮前体细胞调控干细胞巢的实验研究


Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/